Happy Anniversary to our Show Case contributors. Sue Ranscht started it all one year ago.

Authors submit pieces written around a theme and we all comment on them. Those comments include sharp critique as well as praise and they spark discussions about writing and living the writing life. A hundred comments is not unusual and is remarkable, considering that we are a small (albeit passionate) group.

Sample comments worth sharing again:

On Critiques
“Skip the buttering up; get right to the brutality. Saves time. I do not intend to be “brutal” with you — just direct. Okay? Know that I honor everyone who faced down the blank screen to create something of note where there was naught but a void of words before. Truly! Writers write. You are a writer — which leapfrogs you over 90% of the idle ‘someday-I-will’ daydreamers.”
– Carl E. Reed

“I know valid criticism can be disheartening, but don’t even consider stopping. Not even in the furthest corners of your subconscious.”
– John Correll

Farce
“To lighten this up a bit, it was also the case that Kirk was something of a womanizer, or alien-womanizer, and the character often fell into some fleshy imbroglio with a green or blue or other busty hominoid female. How fitting then that Shatner/Kirk rode into space in what can only be described as a giant dildo, a phallus symbolic of his character’s most characteristic trait – a penis in space.”
– Scott D. Vander Ploeg

Rules of Writing
When the rules make sense (as some do and some don’t), it’s better to follow them much of the time but sometimes bend or break them in a thought-out way. This metarule has been stated in many ways by many people. I like the wording in:
«Know the rules, so you can break them effectively.» ~ Dalai Lama XIV”
– Barry Rosen

The Writing life
“Today I finally get to sit at my desk and tackle Multiverse travel. Which means lots of research, reading and answering questions. For me this is fun. My husband gives me the raised eyebrow as he settles into his own fun (heating ducts, boiler pumps, sheet metal etc.)
We all have our loves!”
– Sandy Randall

“Great samples from fellow writers. I am at a buffet table and have overeaten in a good way. Thank you all!”
– Victor Acquista

Experiences that influence our writing
“Monday a young friend of mine attempted suicide. She’s still in the ICU with a heart rate that won’t go above 42 unless they pump her full of adrenaline. They’re contemplating a pacemaker.
Demons have a way of obliterating hope.”
– Sue Ranscht

Happy Notes
“I have written many song parodies as a fun side project, changing the lyrics of famous songs. Some of these parodies have been performed by professional musicians, and I have videos of some of their performances. And I agree with you totally regarding Ayse’s performance. She is a professional opera singer who usually sings arias in operas and in recitals, so I was lucky enough to have her perform my parody.
– Boris Glikman

Fun Writing
“The assailant sprang up, silhouetted by the flickering lamp, and limped toward the street. The roaring monster appeared, lighting the alley like a runway. The assailant shrank from the behemoth machine as it rolled past. Jan laughed maniacally. Those morons were afraid of an automated street cleaner.”
– Christy Moceri

Research
“Around 1586 Kelley told Dee he’d had a vision. An angel had revealed to him that the two men should engage in wife-swapping. And so they did, for a time. That will be fun to write.”
– Mimi Speike

Make writing more fun with Show Case.
Click “Show Case” at the top of this page for details.

And thank Sue for this!

(P.S. To order your very own “Thank You Sue” hoodie, send a sizable donation to Roy@LetsPretend.com)


32 responses to “THANK YOU, SUE!”

  1. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    Showcase is a valuable tool in which I can audition my ideas. It is moving me forward with my assassination plot against Queen Elizabeth, the one area in which my thinking is the murkiest. My next Showcase piece begins:

    Here, right here … before your very eyes …
    I sort out my thinking regarding my convoluted assassination plot. Do the facts fit my fanciful skullduggery? Can I get myself to believe it?

    Frankly, I see significant problems, with my timeline in particular, for I am trying to weave my loopy theory solidly into the historical fact of dates and locales of my various screwball schemers.

    I’ve taken some interesting psychology to begin with, and am making it interesting-er. Even–just don’t think about it too hard–semi-plausible.

    Sly and I are endlessly grateful to Sue for making this brilliant idea happen.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. GD Deckard Avatar

      I have every confidence, Mimi, that you will weave your loopy theory solidly into the historical fact of dates and locales of your various screwball schemers.
      Woot 👍

      Liked by 4 people

      1. mimispeike Avatar
        mimispeike

        My biggest problem: When Robert Dudley’s longed for legitimate heir, able to inherit his title, died age four in 1584, he was heartbroken. I speculate that he had a mental breakdown. But his preparations for a regicide, a fall-guy novice priest imported from the continent, could not have been a spur-of-the-moment act.

        It may have been an on again-off again pipe dream of his. Fired up, cold feet, fired up again, etc. There is also the inconvenient legally wedded wife. For as soon as he wed Lettice Knollys in 1578, he fell out of favor with Elizabeth for good and all. She would not have him to husband, and she would not let him find happiness elsewhere.

        His plan, similar to the Ridolfi plot in which Roberto di Ridolfi intended to wed Mary Queen of Scots to the Duke of Norfolk, cementing her right to the English throne, Dudley envisions blackmailing Mary into marrying him, then forcing her to accept Protestantism as the unchallenged religion of the land. Wives may be dealt with. (As was, according to some, Amy Robsart.)

        He expects to convince the English to welcome the ‘most hated man in the realm’ as King Consort, king in all but title. If this sound too heavy a story for a casual reader, bear in mind that my foremost schemer is a talking cat. My second-most schemer is the Astrologer Royal, who believes he talks to angels.

        Liked by 5 people

    2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Mimi, I am grateful to you and Sly for sharing your boundless creativity with us on Show Case.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. mimispeike Avatar
        mimispeike

        Thanks, Sue. This may sound demanding, but it is not.

        The historical mumbo-jumbo is the background/set-up. The foreground/story is Sly confounding scoundrels and nitwits with his usual merry mischief.

        Liked by 3 people

    3. Sandy Randall Avatar

      Mimi,
      I have been working on a story, in which my primary audience is my youngest brother. He’s 38 and has Down Syndrome. He loves fantasy adventure, so in a way I write to him, but my secondary reason is to craft a compendium of mythological beasts … perhaps for use in some other work.
      Reading how you process your work with Sly and John Dee, you have opened up a whole new avenue for me while processing how I move forward with this “compendium.” While my story is somewhat YA to match my audience, the work I am putting in to the research of the various creatures is not. I appreciate you sharing. I have learned so much!
      PS: I know there has been discussion regarding placing boundaries on what we write based on our audience, typically I write what I want, and this qualifies toward that goal, but since my brother was born, I have always wanted to write something he would enjoy. According to my Mom, He loves the story so far. SO in this instance I’m happy to indulge my audience. lol

      Liked by 2 people

      1. mimispeike Avatar
        mimispeike

        Here’s my trick: I create a ganged file of info off multiple sites. I copy it into the piece I’m working on, and as I write my story, I go shopping below for useful input.

        Thus it was that Sue asked me, of my next Showcase piece, did you mean to send me a file with forty thousand words? Oops. I replaced my entry with my story of sixteen hundred words. Still long, but not forty thousand.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. Sandy Randall Avatar

          I do something similar, but use a separate file. Sometimes I do disservice to myself and forget to give the file a name that I can quickly decide if it’s the one I want or not 😂

          Liked by 1 person

  2. GD Deckard Avatar

    Thank you, Sue. Once again, you were thinking ahead of me. When you started Show Case, I had no inkling of how useful it was going to be to Writers Co-op members, or how much I would personally benefit from it. So, thank you. Again.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      You are a bright light, GD. Thank you.

      Btw, I thought there might be a website attached to Roy’s email, but when I searched for it, I got a message from my browser filter that it might be a spam haven. That sounded right to me. It also made me think it might not be wise to send anything to his @LetsPretend (dot) com email, lol.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. GD Deckard Avatar

        LetsPretend (dot) com is currently for sale for $30,000. I passed. Besides, I still own a domain that I acquired a decade ago. ROFLtimes.com is currently dedicated to gaming humor. The website is outdated, but the name has potential. We might yet resurrect it for a noble purpose.
        Any ideas, anyone?

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Carl E. Reed Avatar

          We could use the site to track harebrained marketing schemes suggested to writers in order to increase their books’ sold-through/reviewed numbers. Also: a way to record/salute/promulgate the worst WTF?-opening paragraphs of self-published drivel. Also: new, strangely appropriate and picturesque words created by typos.

          Liked by 3 people

          1. GD Deckard Avatar

            I like that idea. Kinda like The Onion or Babylon Bee, but just about writers.
            We could even have a special feature, Black Mail. About books we intend to review, but won’t, if offered a proper incentive 😝

            Liked by 3 people

            1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

              ROFL!!!!! I wanna write for the Black Mail feature! The fun will be writing the reviews when they refuse to offer a proper incentive. Gloves off. Rules be damned. Sarcasm mandatory.

              And maybe a feature on improper grammar that reduces the meaning of a sentence to an absurdity. Maybe call it Punctuation, People!

              Liked by 2 people

              1. GD Deckard Avatar

                That’s the spirit!

                Liked by 1 person

          2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            I love those ideas, Carl!

            Liked by 1 person

  3. curtisbausse Avatar

    I second that, GD! And my only defence, inadequate as it is, of my too long absence from these discussions is that their quality has drawn in more – so much that I can’t add any more myself. I can only like what I read (for some reason I can’t ‘like’ it). I like it a lot. Thank you indeed, Sue, for seeing the initiative through to such fruitful results.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      You are welcome, Curtis. Thanks for allowing the experiment to move forward.

      Whenever the site won’t allow me to “like” something, I’ve found that it wants me to log in again, even though I’m sure I’m already logged in. Find that little button at the bottom that invites you to follow even when you know you already do. Click on the three dots and you’ll probably find “Log in” there. Just go ahead and humor (that’s ‘humour’ to you) the site.

      Liked by 3 people

  4. Sandy Randall Avatar

    Allow me to “pile on” to this wonderful celebration!
    I’d like to add my thanks to Sue as well.
    The showcase is a great digital version of sitting around like the Inklings and reading, discussing and pondering the finer or rougher parts of our collective works.
    I’ve learned so much in such a short time just from the discourse.
    I can almost imagine cigar smoke wafting about the room and glasses of cognac clinking as someone refills from a crystal decanter.
    Literary heaven.
    We’ll done Sue! Prost 🥃.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      I’m glad you’ve joined us, Sandy! I’ll pass on the cigar, but raise my snifter to you and all the creatives here. Skumps!

      Liked by 3 people

  5. Sue Ranscht Avatar

    Wow, GD! I appreciate this very thoughtful thanks as much as I appreciate the huge, free slice of the Brigantine’s mud pie on my birthday. And like that decadent dessert, this gratitude needs to be shared with friends. Without all of you, my efforts would be for naught.

    As your quotes indicate, whether the people here have written to a prompt or had time only to comment on someone else’s writing, those who interact here have spawned conversations that explore the unlimited ways writing is affected by — or affects — their lives. That alone surpasses any expectations I had when we started Show Case.

    You are most welcome. I am happy to serve.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. GD Deckard Avatar

      Yeah. Leave it to a bunch of writers to surpass expectations. 😊👍

      Liked by 3 people

  6. Carl E. Reed Avatar

    Kudos to Sue: a most thoughtful, thorough and skilled practitioner of the art of critique. Her reviews miss NOTHING! :::deep bow:::

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Gee willikers, Carl — my editor’s eye is tearing up. My humble heart thanks you.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. GD Deckard Avatar

        Carl’s right, Sue. You have an unusual ability to analyze writing in terms of the author’s intent, and a way of focusing on the key elements of the story that makes the writing easier for the author. And a better read for the reader. You’re a developmental editor.

        Liked by 4 people

        1. mimispeike Avatar
          mimispeike

          I second that. You’re the developmental editor I wish I’d had.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            Thank you, Mimi. I think you can disregard most of what an editor says when they have a different story in mind from the story you are telling.

            Liked by 1 person

        2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

          Thank you, GD. I believe you’re right. “…analyze writing in terms of the author’s intent…” Like granting people the dignity of accepting them for who they are, I think an editor’s job is to help the author tell the story the author wants to tell, not the story the editor thinks the author should tell.

          That ability may be just an extension of seeing how a person sees themself. That’s not always the person they really are inside, but that’s the person you can have the most effective conversation with. And, as trust builds, you might even be able to reach the person they are inside.

          Liked by 2 people

  7. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    I connected with an editor on the Bookkus site. We discussed, via email, many of the works presented there and we were in substantial agreement on (as I recall) all of them.

    She an editor, she did not participate in the voting. I felt like the Wicked Witch of the West, so counter did I run to the prevailing opinions.

    I felt comfortable hiring her. But I took only about 20% of the suggestions she gave me for Sly. I disagreed strongly with the rest of her advice.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      And there’s nothing wrong with that.

      It might have been illuminating to know why she recommended the changes you chose not to make. And she might have learned more about your work if she understood why your chose not to make them. Did you get to discuss those things?

      Liked by 2 people

      1. mimispeike Avatar
        mimispeike

        The big changes she recommended had to do with structure. Information she advised me to isolate in chapters apart from the action, I felt had to be cheek by jowl with the the activity it pertained to.

        I go for a salt and pepper method of storytelling, a dash of this, a blast of that, for immediate flavor. What she advised would have changed the character of my tale. I don’t know how else to put it.

        I believe she thought my this-and-that threw her out of the story. I say it *is* the story, forward motion toward a resolution is secondary.

        I have saved my old reviews from Book Country. I may have saved hers. Or I may have tossed it from disgust. I was in that mood a while back. I’ll see if I still have it.

        ______________________________

        I have found a file of general comments, and another of fifty pages (I believe she had read a lengthy sample) with Word’s side bar format of commentary. I will send you them as attachments in an email.

        Liked by 2 people

  8. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    “Skip the buttering up; get right to the brutality. Saves time. I do not intend to be “brutal” with you — just direct.”

    I’m with Carl. I want to hear the worst. Now, your opinions may not be mine. Still, I want to hear them. They may nudge me ever so slightly in another direction. And they will certainly make me reevaluate my choices and decide if I really stand behind them.

    Liked by 3 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: