WIP Wednesday 10/11/2023

October 11, 2023

Please Note: All submissions are posted ‘As received’ with no edits except possible formatting required by Word Press constraints.

Welcome to WIP Wednesday. Please remember, sharing your fledgling work is a leap of faith. Unlike Show Case, a work in progress is typically rough and unpolished. The feedback and critique are intended to help the writer see other avenues or gain insight as to direction of their prose or poetry.

Beginning with this edition of WIP, we have changed the submission guidelines based on feedback from the September 13th WIP Wednesday. The original word count limit of 500 words provides a great introduction to a writerโ€™s work, yet within this group we are already familiar with the writers. In a sense, introductions are unnecessary. We know we want to read your work. Therefore, writers have submitted one full chapter of work with a maximum of 5000 words.

As we learn and grow, we’ll keep this forum as open and flexible as possible.

Now, enjoy the reads! Ask questions. Provide insight. There is much here to discuss!

The next WIP Wednesday is November 15th. The submission deadline is November 10th. Please send submissions to:


Code Blue and Little Deaths

By GD Deckard

USAF Hospital Clark Airbase, Philippines – image by GD Deckard (1967)

Young men and women of the medical corps in wartime cope with death by seeking life. They watch horror without blinking and look for humanity. If their behavior is outrageous, it is because profound sadness is best balanced by outrageous hope.

one. ICU

Edgar Smith watched the man who had been shot through the brain. The man was standing in the hall of the Intensive Care Unit drinking from the water fountain. He streamed the water with one hand and with the other he steadied himself by gripping his IV stand. Urine swished back and forth in the catheter tubing below his hospital gown. Bandaging had replaced his hair with a turban. The naturally thin man looked frail. But he seemed on his way to full recovery.

The shooter had been an American soldier cleaning his .45 auto in a tent at the Tรขn Sฦกn Nhแบฅt Airport. This man had been shot on arrival, while getting off the plane, and would now go home.

“At least,” Ed joked, “You weren’t in โ€˜Nam long.”

The Mid-western face broke into a big grin. “About forty-five minutes.”

Ed felt the manโ€™s relief. Miracles were accidents.

two. USAF HOSPITAL CLARK

The cafeteria’s atmosphere, like every room in the hospital, was created by its function and the people in it. The large open area of tables and chairs scattered across green and white tile flooring was brought to life by the stainless-steel serving line along the back wall that catered around the clock to staff, patients, and visitors. Ed took a seat and smelled breakfast bacon mingling with the hamburgers for lunch. He listened to the dishes clanking and the people talking and was cleaning his glasses when Captain Kelly looked up from her coffee.

“I was taking a guy to x-ray in a wheelchair,โ€ he told her casually. โ€œShot up, just off medivac. He was in pain, but upbeat. We go by the gift shop, and he says, โ€˜Stop! See that nurse? I want to eyeball-fuck her.’โ€ He shrugged. โ€œI stopped.โ€

โ€œWho was she?โ€ Captain Kelly asked with bright humor in her green eyes.

โ€œJenkins, from O.B.โ€

โ€œOh. That didnโ€™t take him long then.โ€ She turned serious. “You see death, you want life.โ€ She pushed her chair from the table and looked down at the floor and sucked in a breath. Then she stood. “Back to it.”

Ed took in the blonde walking away. Kelly was on the dialysis team and regularly watched young men die because their kidneys had been left on the battlefield. When she was on call at night, Captain Kelly was notified by waking the doctor on call that night. He shook his head. Would he ever meet another woman he could tell this story? She would have to be the woman that Captain Kelly was.

The hospital sat in the tropics on Luzon Island in the Philippines in the South China Sea. Ed waited at the entrance to catch a bus to the front gate, his slim build unwound on the bench in a decidedly unmilitary posture, his hands behind his head. The hot sun precipitated lead into his bones. Above him rose large aluminum letters announcing, “USAF HOSPITAL CLARK,โ€ and five rows of windows shaded by honeycombed panels. Dark clouds shooting bolts of black lightening billowed from the windows on the top floor. That was 5-South, the Intensive Care Unit where he worked. Ed knew the clouds and the black lightning were only in his mind. A thousand wounded men came through the 200-bed hospital every month in 1966; in 1967, that number doubled. Most survived. None were ever the same.


Elevator Charm

by John Correll

Hereโ€™s the first chapter of a witchโ€™s romance, a romcrone, perhaps? It is about 2,700 words. The title isnโ€™t set, but Iโ€™m toying with โ€˜Elevator Charmโ€™. Some bits may be familiar, but Iโ€™m curious if this piece strikes your interest? Would you read on? Which scenes work for you, and which donโ€™t? Are any bits confusing? Do any scenes stand out in drawing you in? Thatโ€™s sort of what Iโ€™d like to know. Then, do you have a really nice agent I can pass this on to? Many thanks in advance for all your help. Cheers, John.

Real witches donโ€™t cure headaches with crystals or read fortunes with tarot cards.

Honest witchcraft requires lymph nodes. Special ones. And a witch begets a girl witch. But a witchโ€™s son, well thatโ€™s another story. Sometimes they become warlocks, sometimes, something else, and a few end up as common accountants. It takes a special witch to love her commoner son.

Commoners, or non-witches, go about their lives without a clue, (unless their mother happens to be a witch.) Witches run their corporations, buy their coffee, or occasionally turn them into toads, but commoners donโ€™t notice. Witches make certain they remain โ€” oblivious. Witch transformations and other spells end up dismissed as a trick of light, deja-vu, memory lapses, a new phase in life, or maybe, just another forgotten battle with reality.

But Max didnโ€™t forget. He didnโ€™t doubt. Reality knocked on his head like an ache in need of a triple-X sized crystal. His uncle, Professor Wolfgang Hardt, a warlock and specialist in medical witchology, pronounced genes to be Maxโ€™s trouble.

After Maxโ€™s birth, Wolfgang told his mother, โ€œLouisa, heโ€™s missing a couple of signature genes, but not the X chromosome triggers, thatโ€™s to be expected considering his heritage.โ€

Louisa held her infant son tight. โ€œHeโ€™s so beautiful. But heโ€™s not a commoner?โ€

Wolfgang shook his head. โ€œNo. Not common. And not a warlock. Witches will hate him and commoners wonโ€™t understand.โ€

โ€œThen heโ€™s special?โ€ she said.

โ€œIn a manner of speaking.โ€

Max grew up between worlds, his motherโ€™s spell casting side who couldnโ€™t control him, and his commoner fatherโ€™s, who thought him odd. He belonged nowhere, until he met Elizabeth.

~~~

Elizbeth believed Max didnโ€™t belong in the same elevator as her. And, in her more than witchly opinion, Max was something else โ€”  a philandering jerk. He could do his flirting somewhere else, preferably in Siberia.

In the darkest corner of her mind, a door opened. A path to the forest of faded dreams. She kicked her temper in, slammed the door shut, locked it, and broke the key. She didnโ€™t need interference.

If Max had been a normal person, or a witch, a regular warlock, Elizabeth would have turned him into a cockroach. Wham โ€” a massive bug because Einstein held a grudge against magic. Basically, witches couldnโ€™t ignore the laws of physics. A witchโ€™s quantum transforms followed the conservation of matter and energy. More simply, an objectโ€™s weight stayed the same no matter how she changed it. But witchcraft wasnโ€™t magic either.

Elizabeth considered herself an applied scientist of quantum string manipulation. A specialized science she was born into. Years of motherly guidance and practice helped. But years of practice achieved nothing against a stinking-rotten-worthless half-breed like Max. What did he call it? Quantum echoes. Spells bounced off him like a mirror. The first time she tried zapping him into a monkey, she craved bananas for a week, and he didnโ€™t even bother to say โ€˜oofโ€™ or scratch his armpit.

She pushed down his collar. He jolted back. But she persisted, revealing a nasty mouth-sized bruise. A drunk vampireโ€™s hundred failed attempts at drawing blood sort-of bite. The bite wasnโ€™t the problem โ€” the fact she didnโ€™t make it was. Without magic, extreme physical violence remained her only option.

You might be surprised at the force an untempered, one-hundred-and-fifteen-pound witch can muster in a heated argument. Approximately nine hundred pounds-per-square-inch, if you want to know โ€” almost the same as a heavyweight boxerโ€™s knockout punch.

Elizabeth cracked her open palm into Maxโ€™s jaw, slamming him against the back of the elevator. He slumped, shook his head, but remained standing. Jenny, who stood at his side, grabbed his arm to keep him from collapsing. Elizabeth suspected Jenny had played a key role in creating Maxโ€™s inept vampire marks.

โ€œWha waa dat fo?โ€ he said, holding his chin.

โ€œWho did that?โ€ Elizabeth pointed at his neck. He raised a finger at Jenny.

But Jenny shook her head. โ€œI did not.โ€

Max closed his eyes, letting his head sway as if asking, โ€˜Can I go to sleep now?โ€™ Jenny tapped his cheek. โ€œWho did do that, Max?โ€

He kept his eyes closed and took a deep breath. โ€œYou did. At the party on Saturday โ€” you threw temperance under a bulldozer or something. And Meghan asked me to help get you home. We drove you, then you puked on the sidewalk and passed out. I carried you to your bed, but on the way, you latched onto my neck. It still hurts, you know.โ€

Jenny let his arm go and crossed her arms. โ€œAnd you put on my nightie and placed Mr. Wiggles, my stuffed unicorn, on my pillow?โ€

Max shook his head and grimaced. โ€œNo. I left. Meghan must have done that.โ€

โ€œOh. Really?โ€ Jenny asked. The elevator stopped, the doors opened, and a crowd stared, waiting to enter.

โ€œYeah, right,โ€ Elizabeth answered. She spun around and raced through the parting masses.

Okay, okay. At this point, you might think Elizabeth and Max were finished, but they go on to live reasonably happy lives โ€” together. No kidding.

Of course, youโ€™d have to define happiness as spending thirty years raising three headstrong witches and three suicidal warlocks. This includes sleepless nights changing an endless supply of diapers. Elizabeth refused this part since she birthed the sweet things. Maxโ€™s favorite happiness involved wrestling the pet dogs when they became king cobras, tigers, and confused tyrannosaurus-rexes. The pretense of โ€˜homeworkโ€™ provided the cute little witches usual excuse. Finally, the happy couple rejoiced at the daily sibling rivalry ritual. This usually involved finding one or more mysteriously vanished brothers. โ€œAlexa, I want to know, this instant, what you did with little Peter. And what is this new coffee table doing in the living room? Is it laughing at me?โ€

But this is more towards the end of the story. Youโ€™ll need to journey back four years to find the real start of this affair:

~~~

Itโ€™s a well-known fact that a witch in search of romance spells trouble. This simple truth hit Elizabeth at the age of eighteen when her aunt defined the nature of her courtship.

โ€œGino will be perfect. Your mother and I are in agreement. And he fits so well โ€” I mean โ€” handsomely in tights,โ€ her aunt Ester explained. Unfortunately, her auntโ€™s definition meant more trouble for the witch than the warlock of Elizabethโ€™s supposed affection.

After the ballet, Elizabeth stood with her aunt and uncle at the reception for the companyโ€™s final performance. A buzz of wealthy admirers and the cast surrounded her. Across the hall, Gino chatted with a middle-aged woman wearing a mink shawl. The woman wore a diamond necklace. The type of diamonds which likely went into a well-guarded vault when not in use. Next to her, a young man, perhaps a couple of years older than Elizabeth, guarded her side. He sported a tailored suit and a black eye patch. Like a pirate. He frowned at Elizabeth with one eye. She took out her phone and checked her reflection. Why didnโ€™t she wear makeup or contacts like Ester said? Why doesnโ€™t he look somewhere else?

Ester droned on, โ€œCommoners might be reasonable practice in high school, dear, but you canโ€™t have children with peasants.โ€

Elizabeth had had a couple of commoner boyfriends. But when she told them about being a witch, they laughed, โ€œSo what, Elizabeth. Thereโ€™s nothing wrong with herbs, crystals, and broomsticks.โ€ Then she transformed their ties into snakes, and they ran. The snakes were only animated silk, but the boys didnโ€™t return. She considered using love spells, but her Oma Tilda nixed that. โ€œSpells fโ€”k up romance, child.โ€

Ester pointed at the one-eyed man. โ€œYou donโ€™t want a halfbreed bastard like Baroness Hartโ€™s son, either.โ€ The man noticed Ester pointing and faced Gino. โ€œYou can never have peace with one of those brutes. They canโ€™t transform anything or even read minds. Worthless. And her stupid child almost killed himself. What was it, Eli?โ€

Elizabethโ€™s uncle Eli coughed. โ€œA grenade, supposedly. But sweetie, it is so kind of you to let Max join the firm; Iโ€™m certain, with training, heโ€™ll beโ€ฆโ€

โ€œCharity case. I donโ€™t see why you bother, Eli.โ€ Ester linked her arm around Eliโ€™s. โ€œElizabeth, stick with warlocks; theyโ€™re the best. They understand that being zapped into a toad is part of a loving courtship.โ€

โ€œAnd learning whoโ€™s boss,โ€ Eli mumbled.

Ester elbowed his ribs and smiled. โ€œAnd you donโ€™t need to worry about powerless children either. Isnโ€™t that so?โ€ Eli nodded and examined the floorโ€™s tile pattern.

Female witches dominated their male counterparts. They mastered witchcraft by transforming larger objects like horses, cars, and people with ease. Their poor men-folk barely managed to turn rabbits into skunks. A warlock thought hard before contradicting the superior sex. The notion of becoming a huge amphibian ensured reflection. Usually, one transformation secured a lifetime of harmony.

Across the hall, a woman using a crutch hobbled up to Gino and kissed his cheek. She must be the dance partner who broke her ankle. Gino placed an overly affectionate hand on her hip and introduced her to the Baroness and her son. The one-eyed son noticed Ginoโ€™s hand, then he returned his focus to Elizabeth. She focused back. She imagined him asking, โ€œDo you want to marry this guy?โ€ But she didnโ€™t have an answer.

Elizabethโ€™s and Ginoโ€™s parents, grandparents, and great-grandparents were pure witches. And purity matched ability. Supposedly her great-great-great-grandmother, Charlotte, molded an elephant into a dragon. Thatโ€™s a lot of molding. Witchcraft meant the ability to transform and move matter with your mind.

At ten years of age, Elizabeth transformed her pony into a fantastic flaming dragon. But only for a short hour. It burned the barn, frightened the dogs, torched the Rolls, destroyed the garden, and her mother promptly changed the beast back. The poor pony became unrideable, and Elizabeth spent three days in the tower mulling.

Ester waved for Gino. He excused himself from his party and approached with the aplomb of a seasoned dancer. As the lead dancer, he had years of practice and could turn a raccoon into a cat. A proper party trick. Ester grabbed Ginoโ€™s shoulder. โ€œGino, let me introduce my niece, Elizabeth.โ€ The one-eyed manโ€™s frown changed.

~~~

On the second day in San Francisco, Elizabeth planned to visit the art museum before her lunch with Gino. She fled from her aunt and uncle on the tenth floor of their new acquisition. An insurance company with tons of money. Boring.

The witch matriarchy pulled humanityโ€™s strings from the start. Witches delegated โ€” not leading or standing in the public eye. Direct leadership invited unhealthy attention and assassination. Witches fostered power and profit backstage. They increased their affluence without annoying questions or public accountability. Indeed, no witch had ever been burned or tried in a common court. Their ability to nudge the thoughts of ordinary men prevented such silliness.

Avoiding the trials of business, Elizabeth ran for the elevator, where a man followed her with one eye. The Baronessโ€™s son. What was his name? Something common โ€” David? John?

The elevator doors sulked, and she tried to read his mind. She was good at it. But he got in the way. His hands, chest, face, and one eye โ€” wow. She imagined sightseeing hands caressing her thighs. Would it be rude to ask what happened to his eye?

Something wasnโ€™t right. Regular menโ€™s emotions beamed like lighthouses on a clear night. Even other witches and warlocks couldnโ€™t hide from her. She might not know their thoughts, but sheโ€™d sense their attraction or displeasure. Did he like her? He stood like an impenetrable fortress.

The elevator bell burst their three-eyed struggle. The doors slid open. They entered and reached for the first-floor button together. Their hands collided, and his fingers pressed against hers. Tenderly. Then he hit her. Not physically. Not violently. Forcefully. All his emotions flooded in โ€” bursting. Foreign feelings warmed her core, spreading to her toes. Amazement, embarrassment, desire, passion, and attraction drowned her. His contagious lust knocked.

โ€œUh?โ€ She snatched his tie and held his hand. She needed to steady herself. She needed to pull him closer.

โ€œYou okay?โ€ He held her arm as the elevator door closed and proceeded downwards.

She pulled herself up. Face to face. What spell was this? Was her sister playing tricks? Her nose touched his chin. He grabbed both her arms and stopped her from kissing.

โ€œSorry, Iโ€™m Max from IT. You were at the ballet yesterday with Dr. Mann and her husband.โ€ His head tilted, ever so, as if she needed to straighten him out. Closer? Or did he expect her to identify herself?

โ€œYou โ€” what are you?โ€ She looked down at his tie and imagined a snake. No โ€” not here.

โ€œStatistical analysis. Just started last week.โ€ The elevator stopped on the third floor, and a handful of people made them scoot to the back. He didnโ€™t let her go.

Then, she canceled her lunch plans.

~~~

On the third day they sat on her hotel bed. She made an excuse about forgetting her jacket and led him in. He slipped off her glasses. โ€œYou have the most beautiful eyes,โ€ he said. She snapped her eyes shut, and he kissed her eyelids, nose, and mouth. He kissed her chin, neck, and shoulder. โ€œYouโ€™re the most beautiful witch in the universe,โ€ he added, tickling her and forcing her eyes open.

โ€œShut up and give my glasses back.โ€ She placed them on the nightstand. Then she unbuttoned his shirt and made love to him for the first time.

At three in the afternoon, her aunt texted, โ€œCome to the tenth-floor staff room, now.โ€

He joined her, and they chatted on the sofa as she waited. They had time because Ester never waited for anyone.

Max reached into his jacket pocket and pulled out a card, but a cute woman in a suit stopped him โ€” a commoner. Her attraction for Max sparked like a faulty arc welder. Overly emotional commoners were easy. With a quick adjustment, Elizabeth made her forget his name.

The woman stuttered, โ€œUh? Iโ€™m sorry, whatโ€™s your โ€” I need a word with you โ€” I think.โ€

โ€œJenny, this is Elizabeth. Weโ€™re waiting for Dr. Mann. Can I come to your office in about ten?โ€

โ€œNo. We need โ€” what was it โ€” to talk. Itโ€™s important. Uh, Max. Right?โ€ She dragged him to the opposite end of the room and whispered to him. Then, they both looked at her.

Elizabeth smiled and waved, and Max waved back with his frown. Quick adjustments never lasted long enough. Jenny shook his arm and spoke in his ear. But he shook his head and started to return to the sofa.

He got halfway when Ester shouted from the door. Elizabeth didnโ€™t respond. She scribbled her number on a scrap of paper and slipped it on her seat. Ester followed her nieceโ€™s glances and detoured for Max. โ€œPlease, donโ€™t turn him into a dodo,โ€ Elizabeth muttered as she stood.

โ€œHaving a good start, Mr. Renovier?โ€ Ester extended a hand and grasped him firmly.

Max glanced at Elizabeth. โ€œVery much, Mam.โ€ Ester followed his gaze and raised her eyebrows โ€” one of those Iโ€™m thinking of frogs moments.

โ€œMam? Weโ€™re not in the Army anymore, my boy.โ€ Her aunt smiled, and nothing happened.

โ€œYes, mmm โ€” Dr. Mann.โ€ Jenny held Maxโ€™s arm with her mouth ajar.

โ€œSay hello to Carl and your mother,โ€ Ester added, not in a weโ€™re-old-friends way, but in an โ€˜I know your parents, and if you cross the line with my niece, youโ€™ll hear it from both ends.โ€™

Ester turned. โ€œCome Elizabeth, we have a flight to catch.โ€

As they flew to LA, her aunt warned, โ€œDonโ€™t ever see that man again. Otherwise, Iโ€™ll let your mother know, and sheโ€™ll turn him into a statue that you wonโ€™t be able to change back.โ€

Her auntโ€™s threat didnโ€™t matter because Max didnโ€™t call. Jenny and her aunt turned him away.

Weeks passed into months, and she couldnโ€™t forget him. And two years later, she pulled out her postcard. In their one encounter, she snapped a pose of him after a shower โ€” her memento. Then, she discovered he had called, despite her auntโ€™s spells.


A Fine Kettle of Fish

by Mimi Speike

The Booted Cat reimagined head-to-toe.
Chapter one of The Rogue Decamp

The steep drop of circular steps would have been a challenge for anyone, let alone an old wreck with bad knees. A wooden hand-hold was long fallen away; only the iron supports remained. The thick stone wall was pierced by staggered slits which failed to illuminate the space to any useful degree. Sly had begged to precede, to coach the descentโ€“broken step here, sirโ€“but the fugitive had ignored him.

Theyโ€™d spent the best part of the afternoon with a panel of officials, until the recipient of irritating exhortations culminating in a disturbing proposal had leapt up, exclaiming โ€œUmeak! Isilik oiloak pixa egin arte!โ€ (Children! Be quiet until the chickens pee!)1 Heโ€™d bolted without a hint of intention to his startled associate, whoโ€™d trailed him down a series of corridors to a little-used exit.

At the foot of the stair, a door opened onto serene formal gardens which were normally a source of delight for both of them, but they were too agitated to enjoy the setting. Sly knew what was in store for him. Lately, any unpleasantness kicked up the same long-litigated dispute. Batten the hatches, boy, he told himself. Youโ€™re in for a real blow this time.

He unleashed a volley of quips assessing the intellects of those theyโ€™d been sparring with. Instead of the chuckles his wit usually earned him, he got annoyed shrugs. In his best nothing-fazes-me voice he exclaimed, โ€œSir! This is a bad business. We must ponder a response, but Iโ€™m not up to it just now. Weโ€™ll go at it tomorrow. What do you say?โ€

Bent low, hand cupping a knee to steady himself, thin lips set in a deep frown, the old man spat, โ€œYou would abandon me to those fat-heads? I refuse to believe it!โ€

The hunched form tottered, but his aide did not back off. Small of stature, nowhere near the otherโ€™s heft, and far from possessing a youthful agility himself, he disdained to act on a very reasonable fear of personal injury. He was focused on making a point. โ€œNot one,โ€ he hissed, โ€œnot a one of those fools saw fit to condemn an insanity. Why would they? They were delighted to watch Monsieur dโ€™Ollot make an ass of himself.โ€

The greybeard lurched to a stone bench, collapsed onto it, and buried his face in his hands. โ€œHoly Mother,โ€ he moaned, โ€œsteel my spine, as you did for my sire of Carcassonne.โ€2

Jakome, thatโ€™s the greybeardโ€™s name, is a gentle soul. He hasnโ€™t a ruthless bone in his body. And, poor guy, he’s easily rattled. Heโ€™s a sad-sack, but no ordinary sad-sack. He’s a sad-sack king. The meeting he’d just fled was a session of his Cabinet of Ministers.

Always timid, heโ€™s become downright withdrawn. He does not give his opinion on any matter until his cat hops onto his lap, whereupon the two seem to confer. His adherents claim he takes comfort in the presence of a beloved pet and plays at confiding in it. Others insist itโ€™s a way to humiliate favor-seekers and annoy adversaries. Many use the term dotty, in private.

Is the conduct a strategy? It cannot realistically be branded judicious temporizing, nor cunning dissimulation, nor, as much as one might wish to believe it, an unremarkable royal fatuity. His friends know heโ€™s unfit to rule; they defend him nonetheless. Crown Prince Bittor will be far harder to manage.

Sly, whoโ€™s Sly? Sly is a cat. That speaks. And reads. He even writes. Hereโ€™s how he explains himself to John Dee, Queen Elizabethโ€™s Royal Astrologer in book four of this series:

โ€œBy the way,โ€ says Dee, โ€œdo I continue to call you O-ek?โ€

โ€œCall me Sly,โ€ says Sly.

โ€œSly. Fine. Sly it is.โ€ Dee hikes an eyebrow. โ€œSo, are you?โ€

The cat grins. โ€œI was born a poor, puny thing on the Scot border. I couldnโ€™t keep up with my siblings. Bullies dubbed me Slaw, Scots, you see, for slow. A friend of mine, a sweetheart named Arabella, called me Slee, clever. When I hit London, I made it Sly.โ€ He winks. โ€œYes, Doctor. Yes, I am.โ€

โ€œYou recited just now, Sly. Awkwardly, but you did indeed read. I know that work, every line of it. I ought to, I wrote it. A cat can be trained to fiddle, I suppose. How is it that you read? No, letโ€™s start with a more fundamental issue. How do you speak? If you speak. If Iโ€™m not gone mad.โ€

โ€œI had weak ankles,โ€ says the cat. โ€œNo zipping around the farmyard for me. Iโ€™d post myself in a busy location and listen to the sounds made by ones who, I slowly got it into my brain, referred to themselves as man, men, woman, women, small but crucial distinctions. The concept of speech was as grand a game to me as, I imagine, ciphers are to you. I had to discover the secret. We know, do we not, that a childโ€™s vocal apparatus is at its most flexible, most able to produce a range of sounds. Thus it is that a tyke learns to speak a foreign language flawlessly, a feat that in a few years is nigh impossible.โ€ 

โ€œA nice argument,โ€ countered Dee, โ€œbut for this: the young of every species have an equal opportunity to master the trick. I have never known a dog, manโ€™s intimate companion, to match your astonishing accomplishment.โ€

โ€œEssential,โ€ lectures the animal, โ€œis a willingness to persist at a difficult task. I reckon it must be an obsession, for so it was with me. And there must be something extraordinary here.โ€ He taps himself on the noggin. โ€œOne cannot be easily discouraged, for discouraging work it is. You know something of that. You drove yourself. You broke new ground. I have long admired you from afar. Here am I, face to face with the great John Dee. I can hardly believe it!โ€

โ€œThat makes two of us,โ€ mutters Dee.

Sly sighed. โ€œA fine kettle of fish,โ€ he muttered. โ€œThe spark,โ€ he growled, โ€œemboldened by some exchange with your silly son, imagines he has an ally there.โ€

โ€œImpossible! Bittor despises him!โ€

โ€œBe that as it may, that stunt was a declaration of newfound sway. Now, part of me says he was trying to get your goat, and he knows damn well how to do it. Laugh it off. Look the other way.โ€

โ€œPart of you says! What does the rest of you say?โ€

โ€œFrankly, itโ€™s a damn ingenious idea. I donโ€™t put it past him. I put nothing past him. We know heโ€™s prone to these eruptions but, if heโ€™s serious, youโ€™d think he would have managed to refrain from advertising his indecent intention.โ€

โ€œI must speak to Bittor.โ€

โ€œNo! It was a jest, thatโ€™s your stance. Play dumb. Give the idiot his free rein. Leave containment to me. I have my own nasty ways, and you know it.โ€

โ€œDo I not!โ€ moaned Jakome.

โ€œI canโ€™t predict the exact nature of my involvement but, whatever I do, no blame will be laid at your door. Iโ€™ll see to that.โ€

โ€œNo blame? What do I say to Saint Peter, standing sentry on the door to Joy Eternal, when the inevitable hour overtakes me?โ€

โ€œPlease! Letโ€™s not dig into that bucket of worms. Iโ€™ve had my fill of nonsense for one day.โ€

โ€œYour fill of nonsense! You, with your ideas! That I always listen to respectfully, do you dare to deny it?โ€

Sly did dare to deny it, to deny it vehemently, but the geezer in a doozy of a tizzy, this was not the time to point out the fallacy of that statement.

โ€œBelief,โ€ the man screamed, โ€œbelief shared by millions, nonsense? Simon Peter, nonsense? Play dumb, while dโ€™Ollot is plotting a crime beyond contemplation? Iโ€™ll tell you what the Cephas will say. Peter will condemn me on the spotโ€“You saw to your own interests? You looked the other way while faith was mocked? Worse, you failed to hinder the corruption of the innocents? Begone, scoundrel! The pearly gate will be slammed in my face. No! I will not tolerate the deviltry. Never!โ€

Sly crept into a swath of greenery as, arms shot skyward, his mentor pledged frenzied allegiance to the expanse of blue slowly dulling to grey, the perhaps observant, possibly responsive region rumored to be the safe harbor after the storm-tossed sea of life, referred to by multitudes as โ€˜the heavensโ€™.

Jakomeโ€™s tiny kingdom occupied a strategic position in a contentious Europe. Buffeted by hulking neighbors, Spain to the south, France to the north, it was peopled by a tribe that claimed to be in a pristine pre-Visigoth state. The people of the lowlands were mongrels. The Navarrese maintained that they conserved the undiluted blood, according to legend, of the offspring of Tubal, son of Japeth, Noahโ€™s grandson.

This was the mountainous territory to which the first settlers had been driven by waves of newcomers. Although both remote and inaccessible, it had intermittently been subdued by foreign forces, but the people had never reconciled themselves to outside governance. Belligerence was their birthright, but active resistance did not suit them; their revolt consisted of pugnacious inertia. In the end, it was not worth the effort necessary to bludgeon them into true submission.

The annexation of Haute-Navarre3 by Castile (not Spain; a whole-peninsula patria was not yet a reality, though it was on the monarchโ€™s wish list) would have added little to Phillipโ€™s wealth, and he had his hands full courting more desirable hold-outs. France was divided into more than twenty provinces and sovereign territories. French unification was proceeding steadily, but the Gallic way was to expand through dynastic alliance. That possibility seemed comfortingly unlikely. In no way could Prince Bittor be considered a โ€˜catchโ€™ for the mighty Valois. Haute-Navarre was let be as a haven to which traitors might withdraw while they negotiated a pardon for their crime, and as a neutral site in which a risky proposal might be advanced quietly, and as quietly withdrawn.

The economy was built on sheep: wool, sheared and spun, and on the item for which the region was best known, eweโ€™s-milk cheese. The only city, a settlement of five thousand situated on the side of a steep hill, was a warren of narrow, gable-roofed houses situated on narrow streets. A prosperous upper town and a squalid lower town were separated by a system of walls. The Haves, wary of the Have-nots, locked the midtown gates every night at eight and punished strays severely.

A crafty populace greeted you and cheated you with the same show of hearty welcome. They communicated with a great deal of gesticulation, seeming to convey what they would not suffer to be plainly spoken, affording them the opportunity to un-say what had never been clearly articulated. The local language challenged the best linguists. Those who gained a grasp of basics were stymied by the wholesale dropping of syllables and a lightning-quick delivery.

There were better places to be than in the wind-walloped hills of Haute-Navarre. For the natives, it was their sacred bit of Godโ€™s green earth, cherished with the ferocity that continues to roil the region today.

That a dirt-poor realm was lusted after by adjoining giants was a notion universally held. Foreigners were suspected spies. Every innkeeper tried to sell information to perplexed patrons, simultaneously badgering them for loose-lipped admissions. The nobility did the same, only demanding a vastly higher price. The king did not play the game but, due to his odd behavior, was reckoned (by neophyte diplomats, not by old hands) a master at it. His interactions were erratic, composed one minute, unhinged the next. Pushed to take a position, he frequently exploded. One ambassador wrote home, โ€œWhen I see him enraged against any person whatsoever, I wish myself in Calcutta.โ€4 All this, of course, is no more than an amusing footnote to the more dangerous antics of the day.

France and Spain were both enemies of England, but at this time Spain posed the graver threat. The crown of Castile housed nearly eighty percent of the inhabitants of the peninsula and, fueled by treasure from New Spain, had become a powerhouse the likes of which the world had never seen. Sly was glad to claim kinship with Castile5 when it suited him. Spain had produced innumerable important written works. The cat counted himself among the letrados, the lettered elite, and corresponded with several of them under the name Sylvester Boots. Sadly, he did not live to see the publication of the greatest of Spanish novelsโ€“Iโ€™ve seen it called the greatest of all novelsโ€“Don Quixote, in 1605.

Two Catholic arch-rivals concurred on this much: The English, carriers of a deviant plague, did the devilโ€™s work in actively spreading the contagion, to the detriment of stable relations with their European cousins. Diplomats gossiped freely about an overdue comeuppance. That Spain was preparing to invade the British Isles was well known. Sly, subjected to diatribes against his homeland,6 was forbidden by the king to respond to them. When he could take no more knocks, he would grumble, โ€œI have a tongue in my head I guess, and I guess I know how to use it.โ€

The king would admonish him, โ€œYou have a brain in your head also, and a good one. It cannot but instruct your tongue to keep still.โ€ And the cat, although spitting mad, would swallow his pride and make nice with men he detested.

________Chapter Notes_________

  1. A Basque proverb, meaning shut up, and stay shut up. (Birds do not pee and poop separately. They plop, as we can readily see on our windshields.)
  2. Bernard Dรฉlicieux, aka the Friar of Carcassonne, battled the corruption of the twelfth century church in a region not far from my Haute-Navarre.
  3. Haute-Navarre is fictitious, although the kingdom of Navarre did exist in this period.
  4. This comment was made about Elizabeth I by โ€˜a French ambassadorโ€™, according to several sources.
  5. Historically correct or not, from here I refer to the conglomerate peninsula as Spain.
  6. Heโ€™d been born and raised in Cumbria, in far-northern England. After years abroad, a good chunk of that time in the service of a foreign government, he remained ferociously loyal to the Virgin Queen.

THE APP

Image credit: S.T. Ranscht

Chapter 1: God and Human Suffering

by Barb Woolard

NOTES:

This is the first chapter of a book for which the title is still a WIP but which will contain the words โ€œthoughts and prayersโ€ in some way.

Chapter 2: Who or What Is God?

Chapter titles 3-10: The God of Fundamentalism, Evangelicalism, and Chistian Nationalism; The Gods of Popular Culture; Does God Answer Prayer?; Parting the Sea; Prayers of the Oppressed; Prayers that Make a Difference; What about Atheists?; An Allegory and a Prayer

I have omitted much of the source information to prevent interruption of the reading; but it is safely recorded and would, of course, be included in the event of publication.

God and Human Suffering

โ€œLetโ€™s all send our thoughts and prayers for the victims of this tragedy.โ€

โ€œThoughts and prayersโ€ has become a cultural clichรฉ and the panacea for social ills during a time when tragedies, many of them preventable, occur with frightening regularity. The problem is thoughts and prayers are not saving any lives; what we need now is action, and I am going to argue that prayer and action are not incompatible, that in fact prayer cannot be divorced from action. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., in his sermon โ€œOn the Misuse of Prayer,โ€ said, โ€œPrayer must never be a substitute for work and intelligence.โ€ Simply put, talk is cheap; prayer requires action.

John Mellencamp, in โ€œThe Eyes of Portland,โ€ sings:

โ€œIn this land of plenty where nothing gets done
To help those who are empty and unable to run
Your tears and prayers won’t help the homeless.โ€

No, tears and prayers wonโ€™t build houses. They also wonโ€™t feed the hungry; comfort or compensate grieving families whose loved ones have been senselessly shot to death; cure the addicted; save the targets of racial, ethnic, and religious hatred from violations of their rights; or protect the LGBTQ+ community whose gender identity or sexual orientation makes them victims of biased laws, religious scorn, and hate crimes. What tears and prayer can do is lead human beings to act as โ€œinstruments of [Godโ€™s] peace,โ€ in the words of Saint Francis. The hard fact is that Godโ€”if such a supernatural being existsโ€”can work only through humans who choose to become instruments of love and peace.

I offer these statistics to demonstrate the enormity of the social ills for which our actions, on both government and personal levels, have been insufficient or misguided. 

The United States is currently the only country in the world with more civilian-held guns than people: 120.5 firearms per 100 people. By my math, thatโ€™s 399,939,500 guns, compared to 331,900,000 people. Ali Mokdad, professor of global health and epidemiology at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), told NPR that the United States stands out among โ€œother well-off countriesโ€ for its level of gun violence. Countries which do have higher rates than the U.S. are those with a โ€œlarge presence of gangs and drug traffickingโ€ or where there is political unrest and economic crisis.

According to the IHME,  โ€œWhen we look exclusively at high-income countries and territories with populations of 10 million or more, the US ranks first.โ€ 

And guns are not the only problem. The National Alliance to End Homelessness reports 582,462 people experiencing homelessness in this country, or about 18 out of every 10,000, and families with children account for 28 percent.

USDA statistics show โ€œ10.2 percent of U.S. households were food insecure at least some time during the year, including 3.8 percent (5.1 million households) that had very low food security,โ€ as of October 18, 2022.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) included this chart in their NIDA IC Fact Sheet 2022 on another public health crisis:

UCLA School of Law Williams Institute reports on hate crimes against LGBTQ+ citizens: โ€œAbout one out of 10 violent victimizations against LGBT people are hate crimes, according to a new study by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law. LGBT people are nine times more likely than non-LGBT people to be victims of violent hate crimes. In addition, LGBT violent hate crime victims are more likely to be younger, have a relationship with their assailant, and have an assailant who is white.โ€

Many times during the 2020 COVID crisis, people on social media said they didnโ€™t trust the CDC or Dr. Fauci or the manufacturers of life-saving vaccines; so they were just going to trust God to take care of them and pray for protection. I have no way of knowing how well that strategy worked out for those individuals, but the number of COVID deaths in this country stands at 1,134,710 as of July 8, 2023 (CDC). I have to believe many of those deaths could have been prevented.

Our country is in distress, and yet we continue to offer the impotent solution of โ€œthoughts and prayers.โ€ Something has to change; in fact, a lot has to change. Thoughts and prayers have their place but only if they result in action which acknowledges human responsibility for solving human problems. My mother taught me, โ€œGod helps those who help themselves.โ€

Senate Chaplain Barry Black, in his prayer for the March 28, 2023 Senate session, prayed for senators to โ€œreject the paralysis of analysis that waits for the miraculousโ€ and asked God to โ€œuse them to battle the demonic forces that seek to engulf us.โ€ Amen, Reverend. This book is filled with examples of everyday people who saw a need and, by prayer coupled with hard work, have accomplished miraculous things.

I believe prayers, if they are to be effective, must consist of three elements: talking, listening, and acting. If I were to make a pie chart to illustrate what prayer truly is, it would look like this:

The yellow area represents talking, which I believe should not take long. It should consist of expressing oneโ€™s desire to see a situation changed and making a sincere appeal to be guided toward some positive personal action. The blue area represents listening: sitting still, meditating, waiting for a response to that appeal for guidance. You wonโ€™t hear an audible voice, or at least I never have; but you will feel your inner eyes opening to embrace inspiration, motivation, and insight into what you can personally do to see your desire fulfilled. The green area, the largest of all, is action. To stop after talking or after talking and listening is not prayer; prayer must result in action if it is to make any difference at all.

In Chapter 3, I talk about two sets of personal friends who founded nonprofit organizations to help feed and house some very deserving people. Not everyone can do that; but everyone can make a phone call, send a text message, write a note or an email, or take a pie to a struggling or grieving friendโ€”or stranger. Everyone can also write their members of Congress to urge them to do their jobs. Some can volunteer, as I did, at a local soup kitchen or food bank; and some can join marches, as I have, to demonstrate to the world that they want change. A text or a pie wonโ€™t solve a problem or heal a broken heart, but it will let the recipient know he or she is not alone or forgotten during a difficult time. Prayer is about community, connection; it means no one should ever feel abandoned in suffering. Prayer cannot be used as an abdication of human responsibility.

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said this about prayer:

โ€œThere can be no gainsaying of the fact that prayer is as natural to the human organism as the rising of the sun is to the cosmic order. Prayer is indigenous to the human spirit. It represents a throbbing desire of the human heart. As [Thomas] Carlyle stated in a letter to a friend: โ€˜Prayer is and remains the native and deepest impulse of the soul of man.โ€™ We often try to call prayer โ€˜absurd and presumptuous.โ€™ But a yearning so age-old and deep-rooted cannot be slain by a couple of objectives [sic]. Men have often tried to dismiss it by affirming that pressing the rigidity of natural law makes it impossible. But such a declaration is unconvincing; for there is something deep down within us that makes us know that God works in a paradox of unpredictable newness and trustworthy faithfulness.โ€

I am not as eloquent as Dr. King, but I also believe prayer is a natural instinct, motivated by the human craving to understand the world around us, to make sense of things we canโ€™t comprehend or explain but which often cause the deepest pain. The question โ€œWhy?โ€ is among a childโ€™s first utterances, and we spend the rest of our lives, from childhood on, looking for answers. When we fail to find those answers in the natural realm, we look instinctively to the supernatural. Concepts of God vary according to culture, religious beliefs, and personal upbringing; but a large percentage of the worldโ€™s population has the sense of something or someone who exists outside the realm of our senses and who, though unseen, affects the things which are seen and experienced.

No one has definitively answered the question of who that supernatural being is,  because that concept defies human understanding. Bishop John Shelby Spong says, โ€œThere is a difference between my experience of God and who God is.โ€ The God images we have created, as I will discuss further in Chapter 2, are of necessity anthropomorphic, because the only way we are capable of explaining the unknown is by relating it to what is known. One of the obstacles to prayer for modern humans is that those anthropomorphic images of God are often primitive, illogical, and nonsensical, based on ancient models incompatible with modern understanding of the world.

Spong also adds, โ€œWe live in a religiously pluralistic world, but there is only one God. This God is not a Christian, nor is this God an adherent of any religious system. All religious systems are human creations by which people in different times and different places seek to journey into that which is ultimately holy and wholly other.โ€ Many religions claim to be heavenโ€™s gate keepers, but in truth, God is the Spirit of Love who gives equal status to every humanโ€”religious or notโ€”and  hears every prayer with equal compassion.

Henry Gee, in his book A (Very) Short History of Life on Earth, says human beings are the only species on the planet who are aware of themselves, of their existence in the world, and of their impact on the earth. If that is true, it also seems fair to say that humans are alone in their awareness of and desire to connect with the supernatural. Cats, dogs, chimpanzees, and elephants can live their entire lives and die without ever giving a thought to whether there is a god, how they should relate to that god, whether that god causes the maladies that send them to the vet, and whether if they were to ask that god very nicely to take away the malady and make them well again, the god would grant their wish. Yet humans have wrestled for centuries with all of those questions and more.

In their attempts to find answers to the plethora of questions, people of various cultures and time periods have recorded their personal experiences and their own understanding of the supernatural in the form of stories. The Bible, the Koran, the Torah, the Sutras, and others are collections of those stories, which serve as a kind of history of the human struggle to connect with the supernatural. I do not believe any of those writings can claim inerrancy or divine authorship, but their value as a written record of human beingsโ€™ efforts to connect with and know the supernatural is inestimable. Literalists who argue for verbal inspiration by God only serve to detract from the message which, when we simply let the stories speak for themselves, can be a powerful source of wisdom and truth. It is to those sources we often turn when seeking answers to lifeโ€™s trials and mysteries, and it is misunderstanding of those sources which has led to our often damaging concepts of who God is, how we should relate to God, and what we can expect from God.

Ancient cultures were polytheistic: the Greeks, the Romans, the Norse, the Celts, to name only a few. Polytheists had whole pantheons of gods to whom they could attribute earthly phenomena. In those pre-scientific cultures, the weather, the sea, love and beauty, fertility, war, the sun, music, the hunt, and dozens more earthly domains all had their own appointed gods and goddesses; the whole range of both grand and petty human emotions was also ascribed to various gods. Those gods frequently intervened in human affairs, some gods being loving and benevolent while others were jealous and vindictive, inflicting their personal wrath on hapless humans.

I believe the God of the Hebrew Old Testament is a carryover from polytheism, reflecting now-revisited concepts of God as an unseen power who regularly intervenes in human affairs and who is the primary cause of everything that happens both to the world at large and to individual people. The angry God who must constantly be appeased by unquestioned obedience and sacrifice, who in Genesis rains down fire from heaven to destroy cities which have displeased him (that God was always male), who also in Genesis sends flood waters to obliterate all life on Earth save a handful of humans and animals because humans had sinned too much, and who in Exodus drowns an entire army in the Red Sea to save his โ€œchosenโ€ people from the Egyptian soldiersโ€™ wrath is not the God Jesus personified in the New Testament. Did God change? I donโ€™t think so. I think the stories changed because of greater human understanding brought about through Jesusโ€™ life and teachings, lessons from other great teachers, and advances in human research and knowledge.

The angry Old Testament God was Zeus on steroids, sending thunder bolts, making deals with Satan, raining fire, and destroying whole populations, but then dropping manna from heaven to feed Godโ€™s โ€œchosenโ€ as they wandered in the wilderness. Who was this God? Who does that stuff? In the New Testament, Jesus showed up as the human face of God: a tangible, relatable, just-like-us-only-different person who came to say, โ€œLook at me if you want to know who God is.โ€ โ€œI and my father are one.โ€ The differences between the God reflected in Jesus and the God who made a bet with Satan in the Book of Job or burned Sodom and Gomorrah to the ground and turned Lotโ€™s wife to a pillar of salt in Genesis are too obvious to mention.

One problem for modern humans is that, even though our knowledge has expanded exponentially, weโ€™re still following pagan reasoning when we try to explain natural and supernatural occurrences; even people who claim no religious belief are influenced by images and ideas from the Christian Bible. Although we have science, philosophy, and psychology to explain how natural phenomena occur, what is real and true, and why people behave as they do, when it comes to God and prayer, we tend to revert to primitive thinking. In Irvine Welshโ€™s short story โ€œThe Granton Star Cause,โ€ discussed further in Chapter 6, God is an angry white man who tells the person next to him in the bar, โ€œIโ€™m getting a little bit fed up with all this self-justification. Itโ€™s not for you c—s to criticize me. I gave you the place. I made you c—s in my own image. You lot get on with it. You f—ing well sort it out.โ€

I especially like Welshโ€™s use of โ€œself-justificationโ€: People blame God to shift culpability from themselves, granting themselves absolution from responsibility. If we are to believe in God as the Spirit of Love, itโ€™s high time we let go of God as the inflictor of pain and suffering. Itโ€™s time we let go of pagan thinking and acknowledge that God is not the cause of everything that happens, that things happen for two reasons: because we live in a world filled with hazards to  which no one is immune and because humans are born with freedom of choice, which we do not always exercise responsibly. Itโ€™s time we stop asking God to cure our social ills, such as gun violence, and admit we caused the problems and itโ€™s our job to fix them. We can ask God for strength and wisdom, to help us help ourselves; but we canโ€™t ask God to clean up our messes and make our country safer. Thatโ€™s up to us.

We ask God โ€œWhy?โ€ when the answer is right before us and has nothing to do with God. No amount of prayer will yield an explanation for why an officer sworn to uphold the law would murder a person who was no threat to the officerโ€™s safety, why innocent children are shot to death in a place of learning which should be a safe haven, why a gay man was beaten to death on his 29th birthday after being randomly chosen by a stranger who just needed to kill a gay person, why a couple would give birth to nine children and lose all of them to the state because of neglect caused by addiction, why lawmakers are obsessed with seeing who can pass the most restrictive laws to save unborn babies while doing little or nothing to protect the lives of breathing children.

God did not cause any of those things to happen. They were caused by human irresponsibility and will have to be cured by human responsibility, and both are choices. Each person in the world can choose to act responsibly or to act irresponsibly, and religious indoctrination does not guarantee more of the former. The determination to act with love toward oneโ€™s neighbor (every other person on the planet) must come from within, where I believe God places the sparks of love, kindness, and compassion but cannot force anyone to act on those instincts. 

A person Iโ€™ve never met posted this on social media in a description of their time spent living in the Middle East: โ€œOne of my favorite things is when you are in a local place on a Friday morning and the call to prayer comes on, and the whole neighborhood just enters the energy of respect. And the neighborhood lets go of chaos and receives calm. Lets go of movement and receives stillnessโ€ (Alex McRobs, quoted with permission).

What our country needs is not necessarily more people who call themselves Christians or Muslims or Buddhists or atheists, but more people who understand being quiet; who know what it means to enter the energy of respect which the universe gives all who are receptive; who can open themselves to releasing their personal, social, and societal chaos and allowing calmness to fill and guide them; who are capable of stopping and being still. Itโ€™s during those times of quiet and stillness that we can hear what Shakespeare calls โ€œthe music of the spheres.โ€

Words and names lose their meanings. What matters is knowing that we are all connected and that peace on Earth will never be bestowed from above; it can be created only by humans who recognize the spark of divinity in every other human, regardless of race, gender identity, sexual identity, or religious/a-religious belief. Peace will come when more people stop talking and start listening. I call that prayer; you may call it what you wish. Our childrenโ€™s lives and future wellbeing will be saved not by our words but by our actionsโ€”actions which place the common good above self-interest, religious differences, and โ€œrights.โ€ Our childrenโ€™s right to live and feel safe supersedes all else. Thereโ€™s our common ground.

As the worldโ€™s population approaches 8 billion souls, we are surrounded by suffering, and we crave explanations and solutions for what seems cruel and unfair. We grapple with how or whether we should pray because many of our learned concepts of God are erroneous, thus our expectations are unrealistic. God is blamed for human atrocities and then implored to right human wrongs. Praying for God to โ€œblessโ€ people in whose suffering we are complicit is an act of deepest hypocrisy, not of faith. Thoughts and prayers must result in action if our country is to live up to its own hype; God canโ€™t bring peace without us.


Cosmic Chalk

by Sandra Randall

This story came from a contest I entered in May of 2022. It was intended to be a flash fiction short story. Stories don’t always work like that for me. To me, stories are but moments in the timeline of a larger story. This piece encouraged me to write a second chapter. The second chapter is the only chapter of this work that was not a contest piece. And if you’re curious, I was disqualified for submitting 1300 words … just a tad over 1.000! They were kind and still sent me feedback. I knew I was over, but I was also down to the wire with the submission. I think (but don’t clearly remember) I had 48hrs to write this.

Here are the contest details and parameters:

YeahWrite Superchallenge #24

This round youโ€™ll be writing a story in 1,000 words or fewer with two prompts.

Prompts:

Your object prompt is: a broken piece of chalk

The โ€œchalkโ€ may be chalk like for a blackboard or sidewalk, or a more formal artistโ€™s chalk like a chalk pastel. It may not be an artistโ€™s charcoal, or a pigment stick held together with wax or oil (notice how thatโ€™s someone elseโ€™s prompt already). At least one piece should appear in your story, but the original unit that the chalk was acquired in must have been broken or smashed at some point before your story starts. 

Your motivation prompt is: A character who wants to find a key they lost at least six months ago.

The key is NOT: a piano key, a musical key, a โ€œchurch keyโ€ bottle opener. It is a KEY, an object that opens a lock or starts a piece of equipment. It can be the sort of electronic key that you just have to push a button on or swipe past the lock. It may also be the kind of key that winds a clock or gears.

The key doesnโ€™t need to belong to this character, but they have to have had it in their possession long enough to lose it. The thing the key opens need not belong to the character. Opening/starting/unlocking/winding the thing need not be the plot of the story, although it can be.

Chapter 1: Broken

The book thumped to the floor. Vor opened her eyes, surprised she had fallen asleep. Rain beat the bay windows of her motherโ€™s cozy front room. Childhood memories crowded around her as she retrieved the book from the floor. Since Daddy died six years ago, her visits home had dwindled.

The wind howled under the eves of the old Victorian farmhouse as the front door banged open in the foyer. She flinched. Wind and rain snatched at curtains and rattled pictures on the wall. Vor scurried to close the door wondering, Where is everyone? โ€œMom?โ€ She called up the wide staircase which lead from the front door to the second floor.

โ€œWeโ€™re in here.โ€ Called Stella from the kitchen. 

Down a short hallway from the foyer to the back of the house, Vor made her way to the kitchen. Her foot sent a small object skittering to bounce off the wall. Curious, she bent over to examine it. A cream-colored piece of chalk the size of her thumb rested on the wooden floor. Rounded on one end from use, and jagged on the other made her look for another piece. Finding none, she slipped the piece in her pocket and pushed the kitchen door open. 

Charlie, a mouthful of cereal, looked up as she entered. Markโ€™s sullen glare remained on the table, his bowl of soggy contents untouched. Stella, pouring coffee into a mug, smiled at her. 

โ€œDid none of you hear the door bang open?โ€ 

โ€œOf course we did, dear,โ€ said her mother. โ€œI knew you were out there and would get it. That stupid latch seems to be faulty.โ€ 

โ€œWhy donโ€™t you fix it?โ€ she asked, walking around the table to pour a mug for herself. 

Stella laughed, โ€œI keep meaning to and I forget. It works well enough, I suppose.โ€

Vor rolled her eyes. โ€œMom, this house will fall down around you if you donโ€™t maintain it like Daddy did.โ€

โ€œI know.โ€ Stella replied softly. Sadness twitched at the corners of her smile.

Mark growled, a soft noise of frustration. โ€œWhatโ€™s with him?โ€ she looked at Charlie, but it was her mother who answered.

โ€œSeems he woke up in a foul mood this morning.โ€

Mark growled again.

Vor frowned at him. โ€œMark, do you suppose you could use your words?โ€

Charlie tipped his bowl and slurped the rest of his cereal in his mouth, swallowed, wiped his mouth on his sleeve, and said, โ€œHe hasnโ€™t said a word since last night. Never seen him in this bad a mood before.โ€ he shrugged, bewildered.

Vor sipped her coffee. Remembering the piece of chalk in her pocket, โ€œOh Mom, found this in the hallway.โ€ 

Issuing a low growl, Mark lunged for the piece of chalk she held out to Stella.

 Recoiling, she dropped her mug. Ceramic shattered on the tile floor, splattering coffee. Mark yelped and backed up against the wall. Charlie shouted, โ€œMark! What the hell, dude!โ€

โ€œOh. Oh, no!โ€ cried Stella, examining the chalk she somehow retrieved in the chaos.

โ€œWhatโ€™s wrong?โ€ asked Vor as Charlie handed her a roll of paper towels.

Stella hissed and looked at Charlie. โ€œWas Mark using this?โ€

Charlie shrugged. โ€œLooks like the piece he was using yesterday. We needed something to draw outlines with for the car weโ€™re working on. Mark found it somewhere in the house.โ€

โ€œMy studio is likely,โ€ she frowned. โ€œVor, run, get the keys from the hook on the foyer wall.โ€ the command in her voice was at odds with her calm demeanor. โ€œI need to have a closer look at Mark.โ€

โ€œKeyโ€™s? You mean daddyโ€™s shop keys?โ€ Vor hadnโ€™t moved. 

Mark growled as Stella neared him. 

โ€œCharlie, come here. I need to look at his eyes. Can you make sure he doesnโ€™t bite me? Letโ€™s have him sit in the chair.โ€

โ€œMother!โ€ Vorโ€™s trepidation escalated. โ€œThere are no keys on the foyer wall. Daddyโ€™s shop keys were missing after his funeral. I know. I went looking for them.โ€

โ€œNonsense.โ€ Retorted Stella. She was peering into one of Markโ€™s eyes while Charlie restrained him. โ€œYep.โ€ She declared. โ€œHeโ€™s been using my chalk.โ€ 

Vor glanced sideways at her mother. Was there more pride than worry in her voice?

Stella strode out of the kitchen to the Foyer. 

Vor and Charlie followed. Mark had not moved from his huddled stance against the wall, panting. 

โ€œHow did I not notice that?โ€ Stella grunted, staring at the empty hook.

โ€œMom, whatโ€™s going on?โ€

Stella held up the piece of chalk. โ€œDo you remember when you and Liv were children? You could use anything in the studio, except the chalk?โ€

Vor nodded. She hadnโ€™t understood why, but something about those chalks meant danger. โ€œWhat does the chalk do?โ€ she asked, suddenly fearful of the answer. โ€œWill Mark be alright?โ€

โ€œLimestone and gypsum make normal chalk. This chalk crafted from extraterrestrial substances is unique. Each stick, represented by its color, performs a specific function, which affects the user. If the chalk remains whole and the user understands its properties, it is a powerful tool. This broken piece is as dangerous as using an electric tool with frayed wiring. As you can see, Mark suffers the effects. I can fix it, but I need that key to power the device to repair this chalk.โ€ 

 โ€œWe need to find that key. Iโ€™ll check Daddyโ€™s shop.โ€

โ€œCharlie, check all the drawers in the house. Mom, go to the studio and get everything ready.โ€ She directed as she slipped on rain boots and grabbed her fatherโ€™s old great coat that lingered on the pegs by the door. She put her hand in the pocket. One of his pipes still lived there. Nostalgia twitched her lips into a sad smile. 

Wind pushed the door as she opened it. Head down, she sloshed across the yard between the wind whipped willow trees.

She pushed the door open to the shop, increasing her hope the keys were in there. Rain dripped off her, muddying the dust covered benches and floor. Stacks of paper, wood, metal parts, and jars of nails and odd bits filled one cubby hole lined wall, and shelves of boxes on another. Despair clutched at her stomach. So many places to look!

She closed her eyes and imagined where a key ring would land when a person walked in. Off to her right, she saw a rusted tool box. She opened it. No key ring. She searched a few more drawers and under dusty papers. Nothing. She turned to go back to the house and there, hanging from the lock on the door, was the key ring. She hurried back to the house.

In the studio, her mother unwrapped a large intricate device. It looked like a coffee grinder with a hopper on top and a small pull out chamber at the bottom. Next to the device sat an ornate metal box, opened to reveal several colorful packets, two cork stoppered jars and a bottle with an eyedropper. 

Stella placed the broken piece of chalk into the bottom chamber and removed the two small jars from the box. Using a miniature ladle, she scooped something out of each jar and carefully dumped it into the hopper on top of the device. Next, she added two drops from the small bottle. She rifled through the colorful packets, choosing a cream-colored packet, matching the broken piece of chalk. After adding the contents to the hopper, she took the keys from Vor. Pulling a small intricate key off the ring; she inserted into a slot at the back of the device. It whirred to life for several minutes, then slowed and stopped with a clunk. The chamber popped open, softly glowing with ethereal light. Stella picked up the chalk, relief expelled in her words. โ€œIf we were too late, the chalk would not have repaired.โ€

Vor sagged onto a stool. She wasnโ€™t entirely certain what happened, but she was grateful she found the key in time.

Charlie, followed by Mark, rushed into the studio. โ€œHe has a headache, but heโ€™s not grumpy anymore!โ€ Declared Charlie.

Everyone but Mark Laughed.

244 responses to “WIP Wednesday 10/11/2023”

  1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

    I am so looking forward to reading each of these — right after I add my thoughts to last month’s submissions from Barb and GD. Right after I finish the deadline for the livelihood work. I promise.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sandy Randall Avatar

      and then there’s Show Case on Friday .โ€ฆ

      Liked by 3 people

  2. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    This has been a hectic few weeks. I revised my chapter one for Bardsy, and for here. I’ve rewritten a few lines again and again. I couldn’t get something I was completely satisfied with. But I think I’ve finally got it. (I stole the boxed insert from book four, serialized on Show Case.)

    I’ll take a day or two off, then start reading. I’m exhausted.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Sandy Randall Avatar

      Was the boxed insert ok? I actually had fun figuring that out. I learned some things about WordPress editor.
      I also learned Iโ€™m spoiled on my own sites because I use Elementor and only lightly use WP editor.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. mimispeike Avatar
        mimispeike

        It’s fine. In the published book I may handle it differently, maybe a different font, maybe a screened-tone box, but this is fine.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Sandy Randall Avatar

          I did attempt a different font but kept getting a weird errorโ€ฆ so I decided to try the box. That worked beautifully. Iโ€™m sure there are other line options which I will explore with time.

          Liked by 3 people

  3. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    Damn, Sue. Where’s the next prompt? I have my piece written. I just have to reconcile it with a prompt.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sandy Randall Avatar

      The prompt may be sewn in the hem of an elaborate gownโ€ฆ

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

        More likely ironed into an interfacing, lol.

        Liked by 2 people

    2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Sorry, Mimi. It has been an overworked and near sleepless 3 weeks. I thought I was up to date when I posted “Align”. The current one is up: “Book”

      Liked by 4 people

  4. GD Deckard Avatar

    Sue Ranscht is busier than she lets on. She is a seamstress on Cygnet Theatre’s world premier production of “The Little Fellow” in San Diego.
    https://www.cygnettheatre.com
    The play’s based on the tell-all memoir of Harriet Wilson, an apparently world-famous British prostitute in the 1830s. It’s an all-Actors’ Equity show and our Sue is responsible for the mockups and the final construction of the female lead’s three outfits.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      That’s very kind of you, GD. I don’t always have so compelling an excuse for posting the next writing prompt days later than I normally intend to do. Fortunately, Mimi — who prepares her responses early in the submission period (and sometimes before) — prods my memory when it needs prodding. She doesn’t necessarily swear at me, lol. The next week and a half will be like the last three, but then I’ll go back to my normal schedule. It will include lying down to sleep, dinner before 10 pm, and time to spend writing, reading, and commenting.

      Thanks for bearing with me. ๐Ÿ™‚

      Liked by 6 people

  5. Sandy Randall Avatar

    GD
    Code Blue and Little Deaths

    Your first line is definitely an attention grabber. As I read the second sentence I am picturing a man with water pouring out of his head.
    Now I have questions. It’s not that I want to read more, I have to. I need to know what is going on in this story!

    You draw the reader in and settle weight of war on them, by letting us in to the head of those tasked with cleaning up the remains of humanity and trying to stitch it back together. The very last line of your chapter reflects the futility of waging war and recovering from war.

    โ€œMost survived. None were ever the same.โ€ ( I think you can find your overall title in this line, something like “Never the Same.”)
    Most importantly, you give a sense of what it was to be Edgar.

    You drew me in. You hooked me. You made me want more of this story. The only thing that took me out of the story and broke up the flow, was this line:

    โ€œWhen she was on call at night, Captain Kelly was notified by waking the doctor on call that night. He shook his head.โ€

    It put me in a loop that I wasn’t quite sure what you meant. Did you mean she was notified by being woken by the doctor on call? I’m not quite sure and coupled with the next line, confused me as to how Edgar made the jump from her on call status to hoping for a woman like her.

    It seems like this paragraph is actually two separate thoughts.
    Thought 1, imagining what she must go through as an on call, getting the news of her dialysis charges dying and then thought 2, wondering how he would explain any of this experience to someone who hasn’t lived it like Captain Kelly.

    GD, Keep going. I know this is your experience. With what is happening now in the world, I wonder if more stories like yours could curb the idiots who promote war!

    Liked by 4 people

    1. GD Deckard Avatar

      Thank you for the encouraging comments, Sandy!
      Umm. You’re not the first to ask the meaning of the line,
      “When she was on call at night, Captain Kelly was notified by waking the doctor on call that night.”
      But many have read that line and known exactly what it means.
      I wondered why, until it dawned on me who seemed to know and who didn’t: I’ve posted this opening chapter on Facebook groups composed of men and women who have served overseas in wars. They knew it means that Kelly slept with the doctor on duty. I probably should change it but… I don’t want to ๐Ÿ˜

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        I had an inklingโ€ฆ but I always miss innuendoโ€ฆ Iโ€™m the one that wakes up at 3am blushing and thinking OMG thatโ€™s what they meant!!

        Liked by 3 people

      2. Sandy Randall Avatar

        Definitely donโ€™t change it.

        Liked by 2 people

      3. Sue Ranscht Avatar

        Maybe you remember that the first time I ever read that line, I was confused, but worked through it to figure out one possible meaning was that she slept with whichever doctor was on call.

        I think the wording has change slightly since that first reading. The problem seems to me to be “Captain Kelly was notified by waking the doctor…” It doesn’t make sense. How is a person notified by something they do? Wouldn’t some outside influence have notified her? Was she asleep just before she woke the on-call doctor to let him know he had to get to work?

        I get that you don’t want to change it, but I’m not sure why you’re okay with leaving it alone knowing confusion is a common response, and it stops many of us in our tracks to dam up the story’s flow. I do believe it could be more clear without coming right out and saying she sleeps with whichever doctor is on call. I also believe the solution is not immediately obvious. It’s definitely a challenge.

        Liked by 4 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          What Sue said. Exactly.

          Liked by 3 people

        2. GD Deckard Avatar

          ๐Ÿ˜I “liked” it twice.

          Liked by 3 people

        3. GD Deckard Avatar

          Thanks, Sandy. And Sue. And Barb. I’m going to apply Stephen King’s approach to that sentence: If several readers suggest changing it, I will. So far, most had no problem understanding it. We’ll see how it goes ๐Ÿ™‚

          As for the structure, โ€œCaptain Kelly was notified by waking the doctorโ€ฆโ€ could be written โ€œCaptain Kelly was notified by ringing the bellโ€ฆ.โ€ The difference is, more people know a bell could be used to notify somebody.

          Really, though. Thank you! This is exactly the kind of discussion any writer would be happy to have!

          Liked by 3 people

          1. Barb Woolard Avatar

            My confusion stems from the passive voice, “Captain Kelly was notified,” making it seem she is the one being alerted. But then she wakes the doctor, making it seem that she is notifying him. It would be clearer to me if he woke her to notify her.

            Liked by 3 people

          2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            If she was notified by “ringing the bell”, she’s the one doing the ringing and it still makes no sense. If “she was notified by the ringing bell”, that makes sense, but then why wasn’t the doctor awakened by the bell as well?

            What is your reason for mystifying Captain Kelly’s sleeping situation?

            Liked by 4 people

            1. Sandy Randall Avatar

              I know I said don’t change it … let me be specific. Don’t change the innuendo. Perhaps revisit this part as if you were sitting at the bar and telling a buddy that story. How would you verbalize the innuendo? Oh yes there would be facial cues, but how would you say this and get that “knowing” look from the friend who never served?
              I think you can get there without spelling it out. Innuendo is fun, but challenging.

              Liked by 3 people

            2. GD Deckard Avatar

              Sue,
              What is your reason for mystifying Captain Kellyโ€™s sleeping situation?
              Perhaps a better question would be, why did I write it that way? Because that is how it was put to me. I knew what was meant: Wake one and they will wake the other; saves the NCO on duty that night a second phone call. This being the first draft, I prefer to write from memory.

              Liked by 2 people

              1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

                Lol! GD, I promise this is the last thing I’ll say about Captain Kelly’s notification.

                I would understand wanting to record accurately if you were writing it as a quotation attributed to a character the reader is getting to know. Then we would begin to associate it with someone who doesn’t necessarily have mastery of the language and would expect further poorly expressed thoughts from that same character. After all, Mrs. Malaprop is a brilliantly enduring character with artfully constructed erroneous speech. Here, you have at least four writers with some degree of competence telling you that a poorly constructed sentence is not only confusing, but doesn’t actually mean what you intend it to mean and stops the forward motion of the story while the reader tries to figure out what it means. Doesn’t an author have both a license and a responsibility to communicate as clearly as possible when writing unattributed narration?

                The fact that the rest of the writing in this chapter communicates so much more clearly only makes this one sentence stand out in such stark contrast that the most natural response is that there must be a typo.

                Liked by 5 people

                1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

                  XI.  Thou shalt communicate as clearly as possible when writing unattributed narration.

                  Liked by 4 people

              2. Sandy Randall Avatar

                Your first draft??
                Oh my Ray Bradbury move over!
                My first drafts rarely get out of the dark closet I write them in! ๐Ÿ˜‚
                Well done GDโ€ฆ a testament to your writing experience!

                Liked by 2 people

                1. GD Deckard Avatar

                  Thank you Sandy.
                  It’s not quick. Instead of rewriting it as needed, I take way too long to write it in the first place! The final draft results from the (usually long) list of criticisms that I have been lucky enough to get. I consider each one, make changes, and then call it finished.

                  Liked by 2 people

                2. Sandy Randall Avatar

                  This is the way…

                  Liked by 1 person

          3. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            If what you mean is that the same bell woke both of them, then maybe something like, she was notified by the same bell that woke the doctor. But maybe not in passive voice.

            Liked by 4 people

        4. Sandy Randall Avatar

          Itโ€™s called emphasis ๐Ÿ˜‚

          Liked by 3 people

        5. Sue Ranscht Avatar

          I liked it twice, too, but then I deleted it for you, lol.

          Liked by 3 people

          1. Barb Woolard Avatar

            Thank you for both. ๐Ÿ™‚ Now can you delete my apology, please? ๐Ÿ™‚

            Liked by 3 people

      4. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

        I’m with Sue on this.  The innuendo is too confusing.

        Liked by 3 people

  6. GD Deckard Avatar

    John Correll:
    “Elizabeth considered herself an applied scientist of quantum string manipulation.”
    That line alone makes your story worth reading. It’s a wonderful hard core sci-fi explanation of whatever magic is performed. Genius!

    Liked by 5 people

  7. GD Deckard Avatar

    Mimi,
    You know I think “A Fine Kettle of Fish” is a delightful romp through a madcap world, well and metriculously created. I enjoyed reading it again.
    The footnotes offer the reader illuminating glimpses into that world. I wouldn’t worry about how they are presented in the manuscript. Do that however feels best to you. But if your publisher suggests a different approach, I’d listen to the voice of one who wants to make money selling your book.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. mimispeike Avatar
      mimispeike

      Thanks, GD. I will listen, if I ever find a publisher. Until then I’ll please myself.

      Liked by 4 people

  8. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    GD – Both these glimpses of a time and place are fascinating, and doubly so because I know they are your genuine experiences. But is the entire work going to consist of nuggets of story? Will there be an underlying, unifying narrative? What do you intend overall?

    Liked by 5 people

    1. GD Deckard Avatar

      Mimi,
      Yes and no. Yes, it’s stories but they hang together and the narrative that emerges is one of sanity and redemption in insane circumstances.

      Liked by 4 people

  9. GD Deckard Avatar

    Sue,
    I’ve enjoyed all the chapters that I’ve read of The App. I’m biased towards this kind of story, and you obviously have fun writing it. That shows in your characters and the attention you give to the narrative. ๐Ÿ™‚ Maybe you should target airport bookstores because The App would be a fun, enjoyable read on any flight.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      It is fun to write. I can hardly wait to get back to it. I’m curious how the additional interactions between Natalie and Erick might have changed your sense of their relationship from what the earlier versions suggested.

      I like your idea about targeting airport bookstores . . .

      Liked by 2 people

  10. GD Deckard Avatar

    Barb,
    “Chapter 1: God and Human Suffering” is thought provoking. (As, I’m sure, you intended.) I have no basis from which to comment on religion and social ills that have been with us since Mesopotamian times aren’t going away anytime soon. But homelessness, in America, is damn well preventable. We have the resources to house and treat people who need it. The problem is they don’t vote.

    Politicians will, however, listen to voters and when the homeless become an eyesore and worse, they get moved. Not housed. Not treated. Moved.

    We could do better than that.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Barb Woolard Avatar

      If people are still seeing this as a book strictly about religion, I’m obviously doing something wrong. It’s supposed to be a social commentary refuting the inanity of requesting “thoughts and prayers” for people whose suffering we ourselves have caused. Any suggestions as to how I can clarify that will be most helpful.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. GD Deckard Avatar

        “the inanity of requesting โ€œthoughts and prayersโ€ for people whose suffering we ourselves have caused.”
        There has to be a clarifying title in there.
        I’m just not sure if I should be reading Nietzsche to make the title come to mind, or George Carlin. Philosophy of social critic?
        ๐Ÿ˜ FYI, I asked Chat-GPT to say that line in the fewest words. It responded, “Itโ€™s absurd to pray for harm weโ€™ve inflicted.”

        Liked by 3 people

  11. GD Deckard Avatar

    Sandy,
    “Rounded on one end from use, and jagged on the other made her look for another piece.”
    I love conflated imagery. You do it well.

    You write an engrossing story. (Searching for something to suggest) I think you could/should expand the paragraph that begins, “Limestone and gypsum make normal chalk.” That paragraph is a “tell” that might read more interestingly if it were a conversation. (As an example of what I mean:)
    “It’s just chalk.”
    “No. Limestone and gypsum make chalk. This is …. Etc.

    And I’m with you. “To me, stories are but moments in the timeline of a larger story.”
    (Wonderful line)

    Liked by 3 people

  12. Sandy Randall Avatar

    I like your suggestion GD. What I submitted was basically my first revision of that chapter since I received the feedback from the contest. Now that I am not bound by the word prompts and word count for that contest, I most definitely can conflate, embellish and expand. I also want to fix the end of the chapter. I want it to be more of a set up for the next chapter, but that will come later. As I present each chapter in the order I wrote them, you will begin to see they aren’t necessarily in order. Yet I still need to decide the order.
    It’s been a lot of fun writing this story based on contest parameters.

    And thank you! It is nice to know that I can write something engrossing.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. Barb Woolard Avatar

    Code Blue and Little Deaths
    GD Deckard

    What I like about this chapter:
    It’s real, it’s raw, and it goes behind the scenes of a long, dark chapter in our national history. I believe this narrative could not have been written so convincingly except by an eye witness.
    The two segments are disjointed, but I rather like the idea of a book of vignettes, portraying various aspects of the Viet Nam experience. The unifying theme is the war and its effects on the participants.
    The final line is powerful: “Most survived. None were ever the same.” Those facts have, in fact, but borne out thousands of times in the lives of veterans.

    My questions and suggestions:
    Sorry, but I just can’t get past the line already much discussed: “When she was on call at night, Captain Kelly was notified by waking the doctor on call that night.” If the only thing I’m supposed to “get” is that they’re sleeping together, that’s easy enough. But one cannot be notified by something one does. I am notified to get out of bed when my alarm goes off, not when I set my alarm. These lines are SO meaningful: “Would he ever meet another woman he could tell this story? She would have to be the woman that Captain Kelly was.” I want to appreciate all that is said and implied here, but when I’m still shaking my head over the previous sentence, these get lost.
    Also, in the fifth line from the end, there’s an “e” in “lightning.”

    War stories are not my usual genre; but having lived through this era and having gone to school with many of those whose lives were never the same, I am drawn to these vignettes of real life behind the scene of the battlefield.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Yes to what Barb has pointed out. However, “lightening” with an “e” is to make something lighter as bleach would do to colors or as taking things out of your carryon makes it weigh less. Black lightning with no “e” should be like forking electricity in the sky. But more disturbing.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        Yes, I tried to make “lightening” work in the context, but I couldn’t. “Dark clouds shooting bolts of black lightening billowed from the windows on the top floor.” Two lines down, “lightning” appears without the “e,” and both words seem to be referring to weather.

        Liked by 4 people

    2. GD Deckard Avatar

      Ack! Manuscript corrected to mean bolts of electric charges! Thank you, for catching that!

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        You’re welcome. This is what I used to get paid to do. ๐Ÿ™‚

        Liked by 3 people

        1. GD Deckard Avatar

          You were a copy editor, Barb?

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Barb Woolard Avatar

            Not professionally. I taught college English and graded about 125 student essays every 2 weeks. The red pens I went through on those!! I have done some copy editing for friends and family: masters theses, books which may have been published (lost track of that one). I’d love to do some copy editing so long as I can still have time for my own writing.

            Liked by 3 people

            1. Barb Woolard Avatar

              When I said I got paid for it, I was referring to the paper grading.

              Liked by 3 people

            2. GD Deckard Avatar

              Well ๐Ÿค” if you’d love to do some copy editing, watch for the next edition of The Rabbit Hole. (We’ve done seven, so I assume we’ll do an eighth edition.)

              DocTom is wrapping up the latest one. Let him know you’d be interested in helping as an editor.

              Liked by 2 people

              1. Sandy Randall Avatar

                Yes heโ€™s already put The thought out there. Barb youโ€™d be a natural!

                Liked by 3 people

              2. Barb Woolard Avatar

                Thanks, GD and Sandy. What’s the best way to contact him?

                Liked by 3 people

                1. GD Deckard Avatar

                  Barb, contact:
                  Tom Wolosz
                  RabbitHoleCoopIV@gmail.com
                  For information, see the title bar at the top of this page, link on the far right, The Rabbit Hole.
                  I’ve worked with Tom and with Curtis and I learned from both of them.

                  Liked by 3 people

                2. Sandy Randall Avatar

                  What GD said … also just respond to his blog post:

                  Here We Go Again!

                  Liked by 3 people

  14. Barb Woolard Avatar

    THE APP
    S.T. Ranscht

    What I like about this chapter:
    I love the way the Polaroid photo ties together the past and present and gives Natalie context for the events of this day.
    The story flows easily, and I get an early feel for who each character is but with still enough mystery to make me want to read on.
    I like the details youโ€™ve added early in the chapter about Natalie and Erick, which help to explain some of her thoughts and actions toward the end.
    I like the fact that several questions are left open, to entice readers to keep reading for the answers: What is the object Natalie has inherited? What exactly is the relationship between Natalie and Erick? With all of Mr. Mortonโ€™s strangeness, might there be other aspects of his character to be revealed later? Will anything come of Natalieโ€™s reaction to Michaelโ€™s charm? Is Michaelโ€™s charm genuine, or might he turn out to be more nefarious?

    My questions and suggestions:
    โ€œFrantic metronomeโ€ and โ€œricocheting ripplesโ€ read as mixed metaphors. Can metronomes be frantic? Can ripples ricochet?

    This is a well-written story with wide appeal. Even those of us who are not sci-fi fans will be drawn in by the human relationships.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Thank you, Barb, for your thoughtful feedback. I’m encouraged that you have questions I’d hoped the chapter would raise. You were right originally that Natalie’s relationship with Erick needed more support. I’m glad the additional interactions provided that. And I love that you’re wondering about Mr. Morton and Michael.

      As for โ€œFrantic metronomeโ€ and โ€œricocheting ripplesโ€ . . .

      I have been in a small rehearsal room with a frantic metronome. It must have been set at the fastest tempo it could achieve, suitable for pacing patter songs. That was decades ago and it’s stuck with me all this time because it was so frantic, it set me on edge. Just thinking about it tightens my stomach and heightens my anxiety level (which is normally very low to non-existent.)

      If you drop a stone in a calm pond, the ripples expand till they either smooth out over a distance or they run into something, like, say, a boulder at the pond’s edge. If the ripples are still strong enough when they hit the boulder, they bounce back (ricochet) in a different wave pattern and cross the remaining ripples that are still headed toward the boulder. Sound waves behave in a similar manner, but spherically rather than circularly. In the case of Natalie’s bootsteps, there are two sources of sound that expand toward the ceiling and both walls and bounce back as echos, crossing themselves and each other. I particularly like using “ricochet” for its association with the forcefulness of gunshots or thrown rocks or billiard balls as an expression of her mood. Plus, I’m a sucker for alliteration, so that’s a bonus, lol.

      Liked by 5 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        I see that ripples do that, but I can’t think they make the same sound as clacking heels. Pebbles would come closer to the sound, I think. But small point, in a strong work.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

          It’s not about the sound, but the physics of the waves. A ricocheted bullet makes a particular sound, but the ricochet is not the sound itself.

          Liked by 4 people

      2. John Correll Avatar

        Sue, I liked the frantic-ricocheting-metronome-ripples, something like that. It makes perfect sense it terms of wave-dynamics. You get an A-plus in describing physics creatively.

        Liked by 4 people

    2. Sandy Randall Avatar

      “Is Michaelโ€™s charm genuine, or might he turn out to be more nefarious?”
      I got that same feel about Michael. Is he shiny chrome or solid gold?
      Keep tuned Dear Reader ….

      Liked by 2 people

  15. Sandy Randall Avatar

    John,

    From the first time I read this story, to the version here now, I see a lot of improvement. You’ve slowed your pace, letting the story unravel, rather than trying to give all the info all at once. Your pacing is better and your voice/style is starting to shine through.
    As GD mentioned, “Itโ€™s a wonderful hard core sci-fi explanation of whatever magic is performed. Genius!” I agree wholeheartedly. You’ve taken that age-old human explanation, of magic, for anything unexplainable and created a character who sees herself as a scientist.

    I do get the sense, through this version and earlier iterations, that you are still working out how you want this story to proceed. This first chapter still feels like possible beginnings. Once you decide upon the actual beginning the other parts will fall naturally throughout the story.

    For me Elizabeth is becoming a more solid character, as is Max. Jenny in the elevator still surprised me. I didn’t realize she was there until this line: “Jenny, who stood at his side, grabbed his arm to keep him from collapsing.”
    I was certain Elizabeth and Max were having a private moment until that line.

    I suggest taking each section and developing it on its own merit. I feel this will be the easiest way to flesh out the extra characters and determine if they are really necessary to the overall story and actually warrant a mention. Doing so may also help with determining the overall plot and where you are hoping to end up.

    By the way I absolutely love Romcrone as a genre!

    Liked by 6 people

    1. John Correll Avatar

      Sandy, thanks for your help with this story. I’ve just finished the last chapter, so with all that knowledge, I should probably hit the first chapter again. It seems the elevator scene needs work… And the order. Thanks, again.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        Congrats on finishing the last chapter! That deserves a moment of celebration before you dig into the work of revision!!

        Liked by 3 people

  16. Sandy Randall Avatar

    Barb,

    I had a question for you. Did I get your images placed correctly and if not please let me know I am happy to correct any errors my formatting may have caused.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Barb Woolard Avatar

      Yes, they’re good. The font got changed on one paragraph, but I’m not worried about it. I ran into the same problems when I made a couple of changes before emailing it to you. Technology is a mystery to me, but it surely does make editing a lot easier.

      Liked by 3 people

  17. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

    @ GD

    Like other commentators, I want to read more and appreciate how clearly U hint that the overall story emerging from the mosaic of episodes will indeed be “sanity and redemption in insane circumstances” (with some humor too).

    I found some awkwardness in two small things (apart from the innuendo about Kelly’s sex life).

    Naming and numbering episodes is nice, but the format of [one. ICU] is off-putting.  Using words rather than numerals for numbers is twee here and would get ugly for numbers above 10.  Would rather see something like [ยง1. ICU] or [Episode 1. ICU].

    Saying “the blonde” in [Ed took in the blonde walking away.] is a tad awkward for somebody Ed knows and has just been talking with.  Would rather go with something like [Ed took in Kelly’s reddish blonde hair as she walked way.], with “reddish” added in keeping with the green eyes and Irish name.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. GD Deckard Avatar

      Thanks, Mellow!
      I took the chapter heading format from Catch 22. If it’s good enough for Joe, it’s good enough for me.

      Saying โ€œthe blondeโ€ is indicative of the emotional distance between Ed and everyone else. It’s one way he stays sane. That comes out strong in some scenes.

      Liked by 4 people

  18. Barb Woolard Avatar

    Elevator Charm
    John Correll

    Things I like about this chapter:
    I love these lines:
    โ€œReal witches donโ€™t cure headaches with crystals or read fortunes with tarot cards. Honest witchcraft requires lymph nodes. Special ones.โ€
    โ€œBasically, witches couldnโ€™t ignore the laws of physics.โ€
    โ€œElizabeth considered herself an applied scientist of quantum string manipulation.โ€
    I like the view that in the world of this work, what is considered magic must operate within the standard laws of nature; that witches live among us, lead corporations, and raise families.

    My questions and suggestions:
    I, too, was rather jolted by Jennyโ€™s sudden materialization in the elevator. Perhaps the scene could be set before the action begins.
    The basics of a story, a romance, are there; but they lack continuity. Elizabeth and Max walk out of the elevator and suddenly are 30 years in the future, having raised children. Then weโ€™re taken back to 4 years pre-elevator scene to learn of their meeting and dating. Long narrative passages interrupt the story line along the way.
    My suggestion is that you shift to a more straightforward chronological order, with perhaps just a brief scene at the beginning where theyโ€™re in the present, then flashing back to bring the reader up to that moment, while keeping that part more linear. I think it would help the flow.

    This is the first time Iโ€™ve read your work, and Iโ€™ll be looking forward to reading more in the future.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. John Correll Avatar

      Thanks so much for your feedback, Barb. I’ll need to rethink the sections, I definitly see your point. The first chapter seems the hardest to puzzle together. I want to introduce certain things, but make it still interesting. Jenny is a major player in the story, so I should highlight her a bit more at the beginning. Back to the drawing board for me…

      Liked by 5 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        Introductions are always the hardest! I used to tell my students to write the essay’s intro paragraph last. It’s much easier to introduce something after you know what it is. Since you now know where the story is going, you can see more clearly how to organize the first chapter to set up the characters’ personalities and relationships. And since you know that Jenny will be a major player, you can figure out what readers need to know about her at the beginning.

        Here’s a suggestion. The first section gives a pretty thorough description of Max: who he is, where he came from, etc. Perhaps you need two more sections like that: one about Elizabeth and one about Jenny. Then when you bring them all together in the elevator, readers know who you’re talking about.

        Liked by 4 people

  19. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    John – I love the psychological underpinning of the story, and all the detail. You are fleshing out a world I can believe in. But I would organize it differently. I have divided it into:

    BACKGROUND โ€“ Max (Real witches …)
    BACKGROUND โ€“ Elizabeth (Itโ€™s a well-known fact …)
    ACTIVE โ€“ Elevator 1 (Elizabeth believed …)
    ACTIVE โ€“ Elevator 2 (On the second day …)
    AFTERMATH (On the third day…)

    This is currently a little too all-over-the-place for me, a little hard to digest. There are sentences I’d take out, I feel they don’t need to be there. But first I’d reconsider the structure.

    I would put Max and Elizabeth in one chapter, combine Elevators 1 and 2 in another, fold them together, followed by On the third day …

    Liked by 5 people

    1. mimispeike Avatar
      mimispeike

      I think I have the elevator scenes wrong, they are years apart. I am confused. If I read it through a few more times, it may be clearer. But if I picked this up in a bookstore and read the first chapter, I would have put it back on the shelf. You would have lost me.

      Liked by 3 people

    2. John Correll Avatar

      Thanks for your help Mimi, I like your new order. I’ll see if I can get it to fit together that way.

      Liked by 4 people

  20. Sandy Randall Avatar

    Mimi
    A Fine Kettle of Fish

    So different yet, the same. The only way I can describe this version compared to the last is polish. A fine elegant table with a dull shine. Still beautiful but a bit lacklustre. You apply your polish and it shines.

    I really do like the changes. I can move through the chapter and understand where I am at every turn.
    I love the history lesson. You prompted me to go read up on Navarre. I had an inkling it was in the Basque region, based on your location description. I have always been fascinated with the Basque and their language.

    Now โ€ฆ how did Sly end up speaking in the Kings ear, all the way from Cumbria? For that I hope we shall see the rest of the chapters here!

    I do like how you explained who Jakome is and who sly is, but the bit where Sly and Dee have their discourse I feel is not necessary and only because I know it comes later. Itโ€™s important to Sly and Deeโ€™s interactions. Plus it is a big reveal for Dee. Putting it in Chapter one may steal that thunder.

    Ok. Iโ€™m ready for chapter two!

    Liked by 4 people

    1. mimispeike Avatar
      mimispeike

      I was trying to answer a specific criticism of the editor at Bardsy. That section may be reworked.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        I look forward to it.
        It always amazes me that something well written can be improved.
        It amazes me more when I manage it! ๐Ÿ˜‚

        Liked by 4 people

  21. John Correll Avatar

    Code Blue and Little Deaths, By GD Deckard.

    GD, if this is a stand-alone story, itโ€™s almost perfect. If itโ€™s the first chapter of a longer story, I donโ€™t see whatโ€™s drawing me to read on. Is there a motivation or goal for Ed somewhere?

    This has already been mentioned, but Iโ€™ll add my vote that โ€œCaptain Kelly was notified by waking the doctor on call that nightโ€ confused me, too. Have somebody say it and add a little explanation, maybe?
    โ€”———————————————-

    A Fine Kettle of Fish, vs. Birds of a Feather (from the โ€˜alignโ€™ prompt), both by Mimi Speike.

    Mimi, youโ€™re going to hate me, but I was comparing these two pieces, and for me, when Sly tells his origins to Dee in โ€˜Birds of a Feather,โ€™ it seemed to make more sense as a first chapter. In Birds of a Feather, you lay it out: hereโ€™s this strange, talking cat. โ€œHow odd,โ€ I thought. I wonder where this can go? The doubting Dee becomes more interesting. Why is he with this sly cat?

    I like the beginning of โ€˜A Fine Kettle of Fish,โ€™ especially the circular stairs. But then thereโ€™s this box explaining who Jakome and Sly are, but it seems to be in a confusing place. Some WordPress column confusion in the editor, perhaps? Anyway, then at the end, you have this lengthy historical exposรฉ, which for me, seems to deflect on whatโ€™s interesting and driving the story forward.

    For me, Birds of a Feather is an excellent beginning for a book. From previous stories submitted in the Prompt, the overall tale revolves around Dee and Sly. Why not start there? If thatโ€™s not the case, then I apologize in advance.
    โ€”———————————————–

    THE APP, by S.T. Ranscht

    Wow, Iโ€™m hooked. Iโ€™m sorry, I canโ€™t think of anything to improve. It just works. Brilliant. I had a good laugh at the GF cookies revelation. My wife is gluten-free, and Iโ€™ve lost count of the number of times Iโ€™ve tried a GF cookie, biscuit, cake, or piece of bread. I nod and say, โ€œThis is good,โ€ when Iโ€™m really thinking, โ€œIs that an after-taste of arsenic, cyanide, or turpentine?โ€

    Maybe one thing: add a sympathy card for Natalie to further her appeal or a reason sheโ€™s with Erick. Donโ€™t know what. Definitely not โ€˜being poor and could use the inheritance.โ€™ Nah. That wouldnโ€™t workโ€ฆ
    โ€”———————————————–

    Cosmic Chalk, by Sandra Randall.

    What a weird and exciting story. Itโ€™s a little clunky, but it works as a first chapter. I think a thought on why Vorโ€™s visits home dwindled might add interest. A sentence of back-story, perhaps.

    Some clunky bits (for me) –

    I was initially confused with, โ€˜Charlie, a mouthful of cereal, looked up as she entered.โ€™ Maybe this is just me, but since this is Charlieโ€™s first mention, I imagined โ€™a mouthful of cerealโ€™ named Charlie. What a peculiar thought, of course, thatโ€™s wrong, but stillโ€ฆ

    โ€˜He (Charlie) shrugged, bewildered.โ€™ I take it that this story, so far, is Vorโ€™s POV. How does she know heโ€™s bewildered?

    In this part:

    โ€œWe need to find that key. Iโ€™ll check Daddyโ€™s shop.โ€

    โ€œCharlie, check all the drawers in the house. Mom, go to the studio and get everything ready.โ€ She directedโ€ฆ

    I lost track of who was saying what. Wouldnโ€™t Stella, as Mom, be the one directing? This might just be me.
    โ€”——————————————–

    God and Human Suffering, by Barb Woolard.

    I apologize if Iโ€™m going to be the fly in the philosophical ointment here. Still, Dr. Martin Luther King has it wrong. Tying prayer with work, intelligence, or โ€˜actionโ€™ misses the whole point of prayer. Itโ€™s like comparing apples with ball bearings. You canโ€™t even say they share the property of being spherical. Prayer is no substitute for action. Itโ€™s something else.

    Prayer is a desperate voice of the powerless. Itโ€™s when youโ€™re in a hell-hole of a hospital in the tropics. A place where the X-ray machine is the 1895 year model Dr. Wilhelm Rรถntgen used. The device he used to discover the mysterious rays. And in this modern hospital, the best doctors shake their heads in frustration. โ€œWe donโ€™t know why your newborn wonโ€™t hold down any food,โ€ they say in some sort of apology. Sometimes, even the powerful are powerless. Then you look at your little daughter struggling to live in the incubator and weep. You donโ€™t know what to do. You are powerless, helpless, and lost. And then an old Fijian woman comes, a patient, a nurse? You donโ€™t remember. She sits next to you as you cry. โ€œCome dear, let us pray together,โ€ she says. Itโ€™s the only thing left when nothing else is left. Itโ€™s the only light in the infinite void of space. Itโ€™s the little glimmer that life isnโ€™t the worthless shit-hole it feels like. It says, sure, youโ€™re powerless, sure, nothing makes sense, but even on the loneliest desert island, you are not alone.

    Without that prayer, rational and sane people might blow their brains out. Why carry on when the universe is such a cruel, uncaring, miserable swamp?

    Prayer isnโ€™t action. It isnโ€™t intelligence. It doesnโ€™t make any sense. Totally Illogical. But somehow, the little clichรฉd words help. They donโ€™t stop the pain or solve the problem. But they let you carry on. I donโ€™t know why. Prayer gives you another day to act.

    And despite the experts from Fiji, New Zealand, and the United States, your little newborn carries on. She becomes a stubborn, strong-headed twenty-three-year-old studying genetics. Of course, with a model slim figure, she still has a strange relationship with food. But you will never forget that woman in the hospital who held your hand.

    Thatโ€™s the sentiment of prayer.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. mimispeike Avatar
      mimispeike

      John, I largely agree with you. Trying to fix a problem, I’ve created more problems. I have to give this careful consideration.

      Liked by 5 people

    2. Barb Woolard Avatar

      John, thank you for your thoughtful and beautifully written remarks.

      I agree with all of your points, and what I’m really trying to say is not that prayer and action are the same thing; I’m saying prayer must *lead to* action. Neither is complete alone. If the woman in your experience had sat in her chair watching your anguish and said a silent prayer for you, you would have been left feeling as distraught and hopeless as you already were. But because she *acted*–walked across the room, took your hand, and prayed *with* you–you felt supported and no longer alone. When people are urged to send “thoughts and prayers” for those whose loved ones have been senselessly murdered in shooting sprees, those anguished people will remain as alone and hopeless as they already are. But when other humans *act*–come together around them, send them tangible tokens of love and support, promote candidates for government positions who may work to improve conditions–they feel supported. That’s what I’m saying in these lines:
      “A text or a pie wonโ€™t solve a problem or heal a broken heart, but it will let the recipient know he or she is not alone or forgotten during a difficult time. Prayer is about community, connection; it means no one should ever feel abandoned in suffering. Prayer cannot be used as an abdication of human responsibility.”
      Speaking to God from my comfortable home which has not yet been shattered by gun violence and thinking I’ve fulfilled my human responsibility to “love my neighbors” is a comfortable copout.
      I hope I can make clear that I’m saying prayer is an act of humans coming together in a tangible way around other humans. Each of us will suffer in life; today it may be you, tomorrow me. We can’t be so arrogant as to ignore those who need support today if we expect to be supported on our own dark days.

      By the way, you write beautifully when you are speaking of personal experiences. Your story has a beginning, middle, and end. It flows. I can feel every emotion. May I suggest you try associating your fictional characters and plots with real-life people and experiences and then telling their stories as you tell this one.

      And my best to your daughter, who is obviously a fighter. She will do well. My granddaughter was diagnosed with Stage 4, high-risk neuroblastoma (a childhood cancer) when she was 2 years old. I, along with her care team, attribute her survival in part to her strong will. She’s now a sassy, opinionated 12-year-old, and we wouldn’t have it any other way.

      Liked by 5 people

  22. Sandy Randall Avatar

    John,
    I so agree with the clunkiness. It was worse … lol … Hmmm a mouthful of cereal named Charlie … Oh … you weren’t giving me ideas … hahaha sorry I couldn’t resist. I agree some of the dialogue is confusing and I hope to have that solved for the next WIP wed. At least this month I have more time to work on it. I appreciate your feedback! Thank you!

    Liked by 3 people

  23. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

    @ John

    While the title is problematic, this piece is off to a good start.  It builds a fantasy world that winks at the reader and bumps into the real world in cleverly funny ways (unlike the typical boring fantasy world).  Whether Elizabeth and Max will be sympathetic enough that some of their struggles will be moving as well as funny remains to be seen, but I am motivated to read on and find out.

    What is an em dash doing between [remain] and [oblivious] in paragraph 3?

    The 3 paragraphs (starting with [Okay, okay …]) where the narrator talks to the reader are jarring, both because the narrator talks to the reader and because time jumps around.  Laughing at the wacky home life in the middle paragraph makes it easier for me to forgive the temporal whiplash, but I’m with Barb in having a having a general preference for chronological order.  Not absolute, of course.

    Liked by 6 people

    1. Barb Woolard Avatar

      Mel, I just learned something new. After all my many years of studying our language, I had to look up the definition of “em dash.” I was taught that a single short line is a hyphen and that two hyphens, side by side with no space, make a dash. So an em dash is what I call a dash. A single line is what I’ve called a hyphen. Perhaps now I can start calling a dash an em dash and stop mentally cursing when people don’t know the difference and have no idea what a hyphen is. You may have just unknowingly helped lower my blood pressure. Thanks.

      Liked by 5 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        I had to do the same thing the first time I heard of em dash … It pops up in the editing and publishing world alot … especially when you’re try to learn about both! lol

        Liked by 4 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          I lived in the academic world, so I guess that’s how I missed it. ๐Ÿ™‚

          Liked by 3 people

      2. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

        The full character set available on a computer or in a print shop is much bigger than what is on a keyboard, where there is no distinction between a hyphen and a minus sign.  (A true minus sign is longer the the [-] on a kbd.)  Typing [-] and then [-] w/o space between them is such a common way to approximate an em dash on a kbd that many apps just assume an em dash was intended and replace the two kbd characters by a single em dash character.  The WP editor does this for posts.

        Glad that knowing a less confusing name for the [—] character helps your blood pressure. Maybe that is part of why mine tends be around 120/70 despite fulminating about the “thoughts and prayers” hypocrites and the neofascists. ๐Ÿ˜‰

        Liked by 5 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          Microsoft Word also blends the two hyphens into a single character, after hitting the space bar, which is the next best thing to a keyboard which would include a real dash.

          Liked by 5 people

          1. Barb Woolard Avatar

            I’m reminded of the time one of my students told me she was unable to complete her outline because her keyboard did not have Roman numerals. ๐Ÿ™‚

            Liked by 5 people

            1. Sandy Randall Avatar

              Now there is a new spin on “Dog ate my homework!” Unless of course her keyboard was in Kanji … then I might have believed it and asked her to switch to Romaji.

              Liked by 5 people

  24. Barb Woolard Avatar

    Cosmic Chalk
    Sandra Randall

    What I like about this chapter:
    I love the first paragraph. Thereโ€™s so much information in just a few sentences.
    You write beautiful descriptions, which appeal to all of the senses. I love reading your descriptive passages.
    I love that you were able to take the prompts and adapt them to your own genre, creating some intriguing, mysterious characters.
    Since you say this is part of a longer story, Iโ€™m left with lots of questionsโ€”in a good wayโ€”about what I want to know as the story continues to unfold.
    My questions and suggestions:
    I found a few sentences confusing:
    โ€œRounded on one end from use, and jagged on the other made her look for another piece.โ€ It doesn’t make sense. It sounds as if the appearance of the chalk should have been part of a preceding sentence, and this sentence should have started with whatever it was that made her look for another piece (a subject for the verb). ๐Ÿ˜Š
    โ€œCharlie, a mouthful of cereal, looked up as she entered.โ€ Others have pointed this out already, but Iโ€™m adding my vote for an edit. Maybe, โ€œCharlie, his mouth full of cereal, looked . . . ” “Mouthful” and “mouth full” are different.
    โ€œStella, pouring coffee into a mug, smiled at her.โ€ I know itโ€™s Vor sheโ€™s smiling at, but since Vorโ€™s name does not appear in the sentence immediately preceding, I feel this sentence would be stronger using the name instead of the pronoun.
    โ€œRecoiling, she dropped her mug.โ€ Both Vor and Stella have just been mentioned, so itโ€™s a little confusing which one is recoiling.
    Another question:
    Is Mark a dog or a human? He sounds like a dog but is expected to talk, and he works on cars. I love a talking dog, and a dog mechanic is an interesting visual. Maybe this is another of those things I would learn in a succeeding chapter, sort of like learning about Sly the Cat.

    I’m really enjoying your work and look forward to reading more.

    Liked by 5 people

    1. Sandy Randall Avatar

      Thank you Barb,
      I appreciate your insight. I had to laugh, the jagged piece of chalk has been a bone of contention for myself. Imagine an old typewriter and wads of paper all around as I struggle with that sentence.
      Step by sloggy step, I’m getting closer to painting that part of the scene correctly. My challenge has been to say, She found a pice of broken chalk, without saying she found a piece of broken chalk. However, I may need to go back to that version … some wise, mellow curmudgeon type, reminded me that sometimes simple is best.
      At the end of the day, I agree that is an area I am working on.
      The same with mouthful Charlie … I will fix that boy, I promise.
      As for Mark, He is most definitely human. An attempt at show rather than tell. The effect of the chalk on him is something I am still exploring. Clearly my lack of knowledge of what the chalk does shows in my description of its effect on Mark.

      I just finished chapter 16 in September. That one was key in helping understand the direction this story is taking. Like John, later chapters are helping me rewrite this first chapter and indeed actually determine what this story is about and it’s actual timeline! Initially this story was about Stella and her craft as a cosmic artist. Vor and Mark start to steal Stella’s thunder in subsequent chapters. I’m excited to see where this story takes me. So far it has run afoul of another story I wrote. The upside, I know what universe this story is coming from. I think it’s a strange parallel to the one we live in! lol
      Best part … I’m having fun with this story, if I can entertain others, I consider it a win!

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        Oy typos abound today … a pice of broken chalk … Bueno! (sigh)

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          Typos are my nemesis. I always used to say “I can spell anything, but my fingers can’t.” ๐Ÿ™‚ Thank goodness for computers where typos are easy to spot and fix. Usually.

          Liked by 3 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            I skip words when I read … Spotting is spotty at best!

            Liked by 3 people

            1. Barb Woolard Avatar

              I do the same thing, which is why I said “usually.” It totally confounds me that I can read over something 50 times and think it’s fine, then put it away and approach it cold, and that typo that was there the whole time leaps right off the page.

              Liked by 4 people

              1. Sandy Randall Avatar

                At least it eventually reveals itself to you. Mine requires a public posting!

                Liked by 3 people

                1. Barb Woolard Avatar

                  Welllllllll, don’t look too closely at a couple of my older comments. I have seen one or two that slipped by me and got out there into public view.

                  Liked by 3 people

  25. Barb Woolard Avatar

    I really like the way she finds the piece of chalk! I agree it’s better to have her kick it in a dimly lit hallway than to say “She found a piece of chalk in the hall.” It’s just the structure of this one sentence: โ€œRounded on one end from use, and jagged on the other made her look for another piece.โ€ It says the shape of the chalk made her look for another piece, which doesn’t make sense to me. BUT if the shape is associated with the “special” chalk her mother uses, then it makes sense that would be a trigger for her. Would this work? “Recognizing the familiar shape–rounded on one end from use and jagged on the other–she quickly began looking for another piece.” Or something.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sandy Randall Avatar

      Yes that does help. I think what makes any of my sentences awkward is when I am unsure … For instance, when I wrote this, I had no idea what cosmic chalk is. Now that I have written more of the story I know more. The other tricky part, the chalk only has an effect on those who can actually use it, but that’s not quite right either.
      Stella is a Cosmic artist .. I had to figure what the heck that was. Once I did, I also discovered she is old, like 200 ish years old. It’s her DNA passed to her progeny that activates the chalk, but it doesn’t work on everyone.
      Ok so what does that mean for Mark? Or Vor or her sister Liv? and then there is Charlie.
      As I got farther into the story, I figured out that Vor and Mark have abilities. Liv and Charlie do not. I think I watch too much Star Wars … lol I definitely see the influence of the force here …
      I’m also enjoying the exploration of their relationships. Stella seems to be a bit aloof and awkward and I’m not entirely certain what to do with that …
      anyway that’s probably a bit too much insight into the chaos of my story writing! I’m just excited that chapter 16 (which is a hot mess) helped me put some pieces together. I am certain I bombed in the contest I did it for, but I consider figuring out some of my issues a success.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        Fascinating thought processes. And this is why I DON’T write fiction! ๐Ÿ™‚ I have, however, been toying with the idea of channeling my inner Jonathan Swift and turning some of my stuff into satire, which might make it feel more approachable for some people. But that will also require me to create worlds and people groups and all that stuff. Maybe . . .

        Liked by 3 people

  26. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

    @ Barb

    This will be a much-needed book.  The four late paragraphs starting with [One problem for modern humans] and the last paragraph have eloquence reminiscent of MLK.

    The main problems I see are narrative arc and how to choose titles.

    Narrative arc!  How can U get the whole thing to flow so strongly that the reader is carried along and does not bail out when they hit a graph or a nuance?  Part of the job may be tough love.  The three paragraphs between those I mentioned are not so MLK-like.  I’d omit the [A person …] paragraph entirely and consider moving/tightening the others.

    Titles!  The chapter titles suggest that the book is more religious (or maybe antireligious) than it is.  It’s hard to come up with titles adequate for the book’s nuanced attitude.  For the book as a whole, I would like to see a zingy title and a subtitle that starts to unpack it.  Here are two possibilities:

    Title: Preludes To Action
    Subtitle: Prayers That Don’t Dump On God

    To get started, the reader is welcome to interpret [dump on] as [blame] or [pass the buck to] or both.  The phrase [thoughts and prayers] reeks of hypocrisy nowadays, so I would avoid it in the title.  The book is far above the hypocrites and those who feel righteous after merely taking cheap shots at them.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Barb Woolard Avatar

      THANK YOU!!! Mel, I really think you may have gotten to the bottom of what I’ve been struggling with. And thanks for the MLK comparison, if for only 2 paragraphs. I’ll take it!

      I added the graphs on the suggestion of a reader, and I think I OVER-responded to the suggestion. You think one graph would be good? Here! I’ll give you three! I am not at all married to them. If they help, good; but if more people see them as a distraction, I can easily let them go.

      I’m having my first cataract surgery tomorrow morning, so I may not feel like staring at my computer for a day or two, but I’ll be mulling all this over. By the weekend, hopefully I can start making some changes.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        “What’s God Got to Do with It?” Title for chapter 1? Too trite??

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

          It’s OK, but I prefer the posted title.

          Glad the eye surgery went so well that U are back on the computer.

          Liked by 4 people

          1. Barb Woolard Avatar

            Thanks again.
            I made the post before I left this morning. Now I’m just taking a minute to catch up. Now it’s nap time.

            Liked by 3 people

        2. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

          “Thoughts and Prayers?” would work as a title for Chapter 1 and would leave one less mention of “God” in the TOC.  Previously considered possibilities for Chapter 1 could be misread as dealing with theodicy.

          Liked by 3 people

          1. Barb Woolard Avatar

            I originally wanted to use “Thoughts about Prayers” for the book title, but I was discouraged from doing that, because it doesn’t give a clear enough idea of what’s inside. But I kind of like:
            Title: Thoughts about Prayers
            Subtitle: Prayers that Don’t Dump on God

            Liked by 3 people

            1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

              Hmmm.  Rather than repeat the word “Prayers” in title and subtitle, U could make it zingy with a swap:
              Title: Donโ€™t Dump on God
              Subtitle: Thoughts about Prayers

              Liked by 3 people

  27. Barb Woolard Avatar

    Bingo! I’ve been trying all day to figure out how to eliminate that repetition, and you beat me to it. Thank you, thank you! I like this.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

      So glad I could be helpful!  ๐Ÿ™‚

      Liked by 2 people

  28. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

    @ Sue

    There is a lot more interesting detail and characterization than in a previously posted version ending with Natalie’s recollection about hearing a hum from the mysterious object.  Love Morton’s “joints that refused to forgive him for not retiring twenty-five ago” and the hint that Morton had a crush on Majel.

    Nice photo.  Close-up of a glass bowl?

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Thanks, Mel! I figured that first post (approximately 20% of Chapter 1) could provide only enough information to pique a little focussed interest in what might be going on. I’m happy to have been able to post the entire chapter this month. You’ve encouraged me to think I might have presented sufficient detail and characterization to suggest depth and future development without having to resort to narrative dumping.

      I actually created the icon image on my iPad. Your guess makes me wish I worked in glass blowing.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        Yes, it does look a bit like Chihuly glass.

        Liked by 3 people

      2. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

        Yes, I do like the level of detail.  Much more would be Dickensian, w/o the motivation of being paid by the word.  While the phrase [narrative dumping] was new to me, it’s self-explanatory and provides a nice label to pin on something that exhausts my patience as a reader.

        Nice job with the iPad.  While the multiple star-like highlights would be hard to get in an original photo outside of a studio, they could have been added to a photo of a real object.  There is a pleasingly real look to the overall image, along with the implication of mysterious swirling.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

          Procreate is my favorite art app. ๐Ÿ™‚

          Liked by 3 people

  29. Barb Woolard Avatar

    The line about his joints is my favorite description in the whole chapter!

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Thanks, Barb. That’s mine, too. I can see Neil Patrick Harris playing the part of 96-year old Bradford J. Morton, Esq. ๐Ÿ˜‰

      Liked by 2 people

  30. Sandy Randall Avatar

    Sue
    The APP
    Chapter 1, The Inheritance

    I am excited to read this. Aside from the complementary Roy piece you did for Show Case, I think most of your writings that I have read are poetry.
    While I enjoy your short game, Iโ€™m excited to see your longer prose. I have purposely avoided reading the comments others have made because I want to read each piece with fresh eyes. So if my comments are repetitive, thatโ€™s why.

    With all the busy you have been up to, I am impressed. I like how you expanded the first part and gave us a better sense of Erick. To me this made Natalie very relatable. Her ambiguous feelings about Erick had me wanting to sit her down and give her advice!

    Michael was a fun surprise. Iโ€™m looking forward to seeing how he factors in this story.

    Your descriptions of Mr. Morton vividly brought him to life for me. (I kept looking for Sly to show up and offer some aid! Lol)

    While your descriptions dropped me solidly into the story, there were a couple of places that took me out and made me reread.

    โ€œShe extended hers. Smelling vaguely of vanilla and violets, he held only her fingers and bent over them to place the breath of a kiss on one knuckle.โ€

    I was confused by who smelled of vanilla and violets and who was doing the smelling.

    โ€œJust coffee, thanks,โ€ Erick said, sidling up against Natalie to nestle her shoulder against his chest. His stony tone drew Natalieโ€™s stealth reprimand.

    Ericks stony tone came too late for me. I had to reread it to picture his tone as stony. Perhaps this would make it easier?

    Sidling up against Natalie to nestle her shoulder against his chest he replied stonily, โ€œJust coffee, thanks.โ€
    Natalie stiffened with disapproval.

    While I like the use of stealth reprimand, Iโ€™m still not sure what her stealth moves are at this point in the story. Though it does round her out as a person who expects her significant other to understand her non verbal cues. Erick seems clueless to those โ€ฆ but Michael โ€ฆ ooh la la โ€ฆ.

    Another relatable Natalie moment is ducking into the womenโ€™s room for a moment alone. Wow, how many times did I do that during a bad relationship? Very, very relatable!

    I canโ€™t wait to read the rest of this.
    I canโ€™t wait to see if Erick redeems himself and if Michael is actually the creeper! Lol

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Thanks, for the detailed feedback, Sandy.

      I love your reaction to Michael! “Ooh la la,” indeed. It’s gratifying that you have those questions about both men.

      You’re right about the two passages you found confusing. I’ve edited them in THE APP’s Pages document to make them clearer. The first now reads: She extended hers. He, smelling vaguely of vanilla and violets, held only her fingers and bent over them to place the breath of a kiss on one knuckle. The second is: Erick sidled up against Natalie to nestle her shoulder against his chest. His reply was a stony, “Just coffee, thanks.” Natalie stiffened. Defiant, Erick ignored her stealth reprimand, pulled the balled-up napkin out of his pocket, and, glaring at the assistant, dropped it into the wastebasket beside the desk.

      I like “stealth reprimand”, too, lol. So I’ve not only kept it, but also provided an example of what it might look like. I don’t want Erick to come across as clueless. He understands their non-verbal communication, but does what he feels is justified, regardless. Right now — rightly or wrongly — he feels a need to mark his territory. We will learn more about what changed their relationship.

      The first fifteen chapters of this story are complete. I was about 1,700 words into Chapter 16 when I had to set it aside for a little while, and I’m really eager to get back to it. The reason I’m telling you this is to say I didn’t have to do a lot of work on Chapter 1 to post it here. I’d done most of the Bardsy revisions well before The Little Fellow’s costume work came along. All this needed was a brief once-over.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        Yay!! You worked ‘Stealth Reprimand’ in seamlessly! I knew you would but it is fun to see the changes!
        I hope your Little Fellow’s work went well.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

          The Little Fellow work continues. I brought alterations home from the theatre last night. It’s time to get back to them . . .

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            Chop! Chop! Back to work!๐Ÿ˜

            Liked by 1 person

      2. Barb Woolard Avatar

        I love the way you’ve revised the “stealth reprimand” segment.

        Liked by 3 people

  31. Sandy Randall Avatar

    Barb

    Chapter 1: God and Human Suffering

    I agree with Mellow. This book is timely and necessary. I applaud you for taking this on. When I attempt to write socially conscious pieces, I quickly become overwhelmed by humanity and the variety of humanity with whom we share this planet. Itโ€™s clear your topic is focused and you are able to keep it focused.

    The link at the bottom, is to a word I ran across that might make an interesting first chapter โ€œquote.โ€ I think it speaks to the core of what you are trying to say.

    I also agree with Mellow about the charts and graphs. Your message is backed up with quotes and searchable sources. I think the images are distracting and make me feel like I am preparing for an exam. I think you should still include them, but within an appendix? Maybe? I think more impactful would be images of humanity where itโ€™s clear thoughts and prayers, without action, donโ€™t work. (The Red Cross commercials excel at heart string tugs.)

    It is clear you are writing this from your heart, but you guard your heart behind facts. Where Mellow describes your prose as MLK-ish, it means you are touching on that inner passion that makes this subject important. Channel that.

    I look forward to the rest of this. Again, your work is timely. Your voice MUST be heard!

    Here’s the link:
    https://www.dictionaryofobscuresorrows.com/post/23536922667/sonder

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      Sonder. A concept I try always to keep in mind, but a word I’ve never heard before. Did someone just make it up or does it have legitimate linguistic roots?

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        From what I can tell this particular meaning is made up. Oxford has several meanings and cites various years when it was used and how. At one time it had this meaning adj. & n.
        Of or relating to a class of small racing yachts. Also: designating this class of yacht.

        If you follow the link there is a really nice video that goes with the words

        I feel like the concept is natural for writers.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

          Too bad there is not a common word for the important concept.  I’m wary of using a word in a way that has only one hit on Google, ranked below the hit for Sonder as a hospitality business.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            Originally I found this on FB. A friend had posted it from a memory of 8yrs ago and I found the words relevant. Rather than just forward a FB meme, I looked up the word in Merriam-Webster (there is no such word) and in the online Oxford dictionary, which should me some various uses from over 100 years ago.
            The dictionary that does list this word is called ‘The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows.’ I did not look any further than that. Still I liked the sentiment and the video. I did find that relevant.

            Liked by 3 people

      2. Sandy Randall Avatar

        Here’s the video link … it was tiny on the page

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          This is absolutely beautiful! I was started to tear up, but I stopped myself because I was afraid it would hurt my healing in the eye that just had cataract surgery. hahaha

          Liked by 3 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            I think this is the effect you want your readers to have ๐Ÿ˜

            Liked by 2 people

            1. Barb Woolard Avatar

              And note the typo: “I was started.” ๐Ÿ™‚

              Liked by 2 people

              1. Sandy Randall Avatar

                Just proof of your humanity! No AI there!

                Liked by 2 people

      3. Barb Woolard Avatar

        Yes, as an empath, I am vividly aware of this is concept, but I’ve never known there is a name for it. Thank you for sharing this! I love it and love the detailed description the dictionary provides. Maybe “Everyone Has a Story” is a good chapter 1 title??

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          I was just reminded of an experience last summer when I was in Glasgow, in a town square filled with people mingling around. Out of the crowd, I spotted an elderly man dressed somewhat shabbily. I felt an instant inner attachment to this person. He came closer, noticed me also, and we exchanged a couple of words. I can’t even remember what they were, but that encounter is an indelible image in my brain. Weird.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            I love interactionโ€™s like thatโ€ฆ little meaningful connections that remind you humanity has a beautiful poignant side!

            Liked by 2 people

    2. Barb Woolard Avatar

      Sandy, thank you, as always, for your encouraging remarks. Since I’m feeling fine and can see better than in years–but still can’t wear eye make-up, therefore am vainly reluctant to be seen in public–I plan to spend the next three days at my computer. You and Mellow have given me much to think about.

      The graphs are already gone. As I said, a reader suggested ONE; and in my usual eagerness to “get it right,” I decided if ONE is good, THREE will be great. I agree that some photos would be effective. I’m sure I can find plenty, but I’ll try NOT to attach one to every paragraph. LOL!

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

        I like Sandy’s suggestion of keeping some graphs but putting them in an appendix.

        Liked by 3 people

  32. Barb Woolard Avatar

    A Fine Kettle of Fish
    Mimi Speike

    What I like about this chapter:
    As a cat lover, I adore Sly. A smart, cunning, articulate, smart-ass yet loyal-to-the-end cat is my dream protagonist.
    The friendship between the man and the cat is relatable, while still different, since most of our cats donโ€™t speak English.
    You write wonderful descriptions. You bring scenes to life without overdoing the modifiers.
    I like the mix of real geographic locations with your fictional locales. The piece feels recognizable while at the same time exotic.

    My questions and suggestions:
    Up to the box, I find the dialogue confusing. I spent the whole first reading wondering what the old manโ€™s name is; then I learned it in the boxed passage. Since neither Sly nor the old man is identified in the various quotations and actions, I had to keep backtracking to figure out who was speaking, shrugging, or whatever, each time.
    This line seems cumbersome to me: โ€œuntil the recipient of irritating exhortations culminating in a disturbing proposal had leapt up . . .โ€ That requires more mental gymnastics than I might be inclined to do.
    Is the box part of the chapter or something you inserted for our benefit?
    Iโ€™m curious about the biblical allusions. They donโ€™t seem to connect to anything else in the story.
    This paragraph: โ€œThere were better places to be than in the wind-walloped hills of Haute-Navarre. For the natives, it was their sacred bit of Godโ€™s green earth, cherished with the ferocity that continues to roil the region today.โ€ Did you mean there were NO better places to be? If not, I think a transition is needed here. Also, “roilโ€ carries a negative connotation. Is that your intention?

    You tell a wonderful story. I look forward to reading the rest.

    Liked by 3 people

  33. Barb Woolard Avatar

    Major revisions happening. I’m probably going to submit this same chapter next time, since I so strongly believe that if the intro is not right, ain’t nobody ever gonna know how brilliant the rest of it is. This is just a sample of the new beginning. (Thanks to Sandy for the idea.)

    Chapter 1, Everyone Has a Story

    Moments in time.
    I bought a hand-sewn doll from a wide-eyed little girl at a Bedouin village in the West Bank of Israel-Palestine. The doll is in a frame, hanging on my wall. The village has since been razed, and the girlโ€™s whereabouts will forevermore be unknown to me. I met two Muslim women as I and six of my adventuresome American and British friends walked along a busy Israeli highway in search of that same Bedouin village, to which we had been invited to hear the eveningโ€™s speakers. Realizing we were lost, the two women kindly flagged us down and led us the last few hundred yards to our destination, their home. In a busy public square in Glasgow, Scotland, I felt instinctively drawn to an old, shabbily dressed man, whose gait was more a shuffle than a stride. We approached each other, our eyes met, and we said a word or two before moving on through that small pond of humanity. At a townhall meeting in Fort Myers, Florida, I met a group of survivors from Parkland, Florida, just weeks after they had witnessed the senseless murders of fourteen classmates and three staff members in the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.

    *A few paragraphs about human interconnectedness* Then:

    โ€œAny manโ€™s death diminishes me,/Because I am involved in mankind.โ€ โ€œWhatever affects one directly affects all indirectly.โ€ Because we are all part of a human web, when one suffers, all suffer. When tragedy strikes one spot on the globe, humans in all of the other parts rise up in empathy, sadness, outrage, support. We send our โ€œthoughts and prayersโ€ for fellow humans whose existence we had been unaware of until that moment, yet for whom we feel the deepest pain.
    Thatโ€™s the good part.
    The bad part is that โ€œthoughts and prayersโ€ has become for many no more than a clichรฉ and a panacea for social ills during a time when tragedies, many of them preventable, occur with frightening regularity. The problem is thoughts and prayers alone are not solving any problems or saving any lives; what we need is action, and I am going to argue that prayer and action are not incompatible, that in fact prayer cannot be divorced from action. ETC, ETC, ETC

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sandy Randall Avatar

      Bravo!! Yes. That’s the right direction. Human connection. Thoughts and Prayers are an attempt to connect when you know no other way to say, “Man some bad shit just happened to you and I’m at a loss how to let you know I feel you, I just don’t know how to fix this.” Because to me that is the basis of platitudes. I want to relate and connect, but I have no relevant experience. That works for the every day person, happening upon a shit show. It’s an empty platitude coming from leadership if it’s not followed up with, “Our thoughts and prayers are with you, but even more, here is our plan to make sure it never happens again …”
      I’m excited to see how this evolves!

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        Thanks for the feedback!

        Liked by 2 people

  34. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    Barb โ€“ These are admirable thoughts, beautifully put. Unfortunately, they will roll off the backs of those who most need to hear them.

    For all your insistence that itโ€™s not about God, you sure do refer to him/her/it a lot. There is no way this will not be taken as a commentary on religion. Also, you are dealing in generalities. Tie โ€˜thoughts and prayersโ€™ to specific events, in other words, make it more political, and more personal, and I would be more likely to read it.

    I am not against being given a history of religion. I have dozens of them, especially on the origins of religions of the Near East. I find them fascinating.

    This has an inspirational feel to it. The hard-core โ€˜thoughts and prayersโ€™ folks donโ€™t want to be inspired to question their thinking, they want it to be confirmed and applauded. โ€˜Thoughts and prayersโ€™ is the easy answer for people who think concrete change is neither necessary nor desirable. (Gun laws, etc.) Theyโ€™ll likely take this as the top of the slippery slope into Woke-ism.

    The revised introduction above is more promising.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Barb Woolard Avatar

      Mimi, thank you for your feedback. One of the biggest struggles I’ve had is figuring out how to talk about prayer without talking about God. Prayer is generally considered the act of speaking to a deity, so how does one discuss the speaker without mentioning the hearer? Even though many of the “thoughts and prayers” people are not religious, prayer itself is generally seen as a religious act.

      It may be that my best bet is to accept two things as givens: (1) There is no such thing as a book that everyone will want to read, so I have to decide how to attract the widest audience, knowing some will never be interested. Some of us have no interest in sci-fi, westerns, horror, etc., which is okay. Enough people are interested that each book will find a niche. (2) If most people are going to see it as religious, I can accept that it is what it is and market to that audience, hoping to change a few people’s narrow point of view.

      Liked by 4 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        Barb,
        I think where you lose yourself is in trying to attract an audienceโ€ฆ go back to โ€œfield of dreams โ€œโ€ฆ โ€œbuild it and they will come.โ€
        Your audience is there, in the most unsuspecting of people. People who the words, โ€œthoughts and prayers โ€œ are meaningless platitudes.
        You are willing to face this platitude head on with the courage of your heart and the creative energy of your soul.
        This is where connections are made.
        Think of every time you read something and found yourself saying outloud to no one in particular โ€œYes! This is exactly how I feel!โ€
        Then you read on immersed in the path of solving the issue.
        Mindfulness of readership is one thing. Tailoring your work to a specific audience could lose wider appeal.

        Liked by 4 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          Good points! Everything I write is from my heart, but it’s hard to ignore the fact that agents and editors are looking for what sells. And agents expect writers to be able to describe their genre or nonfiction category, so there’s that.

          Liked by 5 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            Forget the agents and the publishers. Theyโ€™re there and will be there.
            Right now just write to your heartโ€™s content.
            Take a page out of Mimiโ€™s playbookโ€ฆ until thereโ€™s a publisher, Iโ€™ll do what makes me happy. (Paraphrased)
            Right now youโ€™re still WIP.
            Once youโ€™re at Beta read/ developmental editor needโ€ฆ donโ€™t worry about the audience.
            You have a message to get outโ€ฆ out of you first โ€ฆ then the world.
            For now
            Just write!

            Liked by 5 people

        2. Barb Woolard Avatar

          A valuable lesson I learned during my essay-grading days was to separate the subject matter and point of view from the quality of the writing. It wasn’t always easy to give an A to a student whose POV was the polar opposite of mine but the writing was excellent, or a D to one whose POV agreed with mine but the writing was a disaster. But I did it! I always told them it was not their job to agree with me but to present and defend their own POV clearly and convincingly.

          I guess my job now is to learn that lesson as the writer instead of the reader. ๐Ÿ™‚

          Liked by 4 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            I appreciate you sharing your lessons with us. We all benefit from your experience!

            Liked by 2 people

            1. Barb Woolard Avatar

              Yeah, I guess it’s the same thing you’re saying: Write what you believe, not what you think will get you an A. Or an A-gent. ๐Ÿ™‚

              Liked by 3 people

              1. Sandy Randall Avatar

                ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅฐ

                Liked by 2 people

      2. Sandy Randall Avatar

        Funnyโ€ฆ right after I finish my reply I get a link that is within the same topic.

        Iโ€™m feeling used by the Universe! ๐Ÿ˜‚

        Liked by 2 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          This is excellent!

          Liked by 2 people

  35. Sue Ranscht Avatar

    GD – Code Blue and Little Deaths

    Edgar Smith watched the man who had been shot through the brain.” Great hook! I anticipated watching an unresponsive man near death. The surprising reality drew me immediately into the hopefulness you offer in contrast to the tragedy. The promise of a complex, satisfying story. Ed’s ability to joke about the patient’s situation makes me like the protagonist. Ending the section with “Miracles were accidents” gives this vignette the feeling of a fable.

    Your writing style seems spare and deliberate, building detail upon detail to paint a complete scene.

    The second section has the same careful construction, setting a scene that stimulates all the senses. The exchange between Ed and Captain Kelly is succinct and paced like a comedian’s routine. I’m a little put off that the first paragraph uses the pronoun “he” four times without ever naming anyone. I know “He shrugged” refers to Ed, but I really wanted to read “Ed shrugged.” The comic timing is great except for one small distraction. There needs to be a beat between these two sentences: “That didnโ€™t take him long then.” She turned serious.” Wait for the laugh. Maybe fill it with Ed’s brief reaction, silent or verbalized.

    I’m conflicted about the last paragraph. The transition between Ed’s thoughts about Captain Kelly (which seem to conclude the section very nicely) and the description of the hospital’s outside is pretty rough. I wonder if this paragraph might better serve as an introduction to the entire story.

    I’m enjoying how easily your storytelling gets me to care about each character you introduce me to. I love that each vignette so far ends with a little statement of truth.

    Liked by 4 people

  36. Sue Ranscht Avatar

    John — Elevator Charm

    I want to enjoy this as a romp because its energy and sense of fun should make it so. For me to do that, it needs tightening throughout and clearer focus on the goal so it stops getting in its own way. I won’t get into the nitty-gritty of grammar or vocabulary choices that sometimes rely on slightly inaccurate meanings, but I’d like to highlight a few of the stumbling blocks I tripped over as I read.

    The first sentence isn’t as much a hook as it is the middle of an explanation of this world, which then continues for the rest of that section. I think it would be more effective for the reader to meet Max, Elizabeth, and Jenny at the beginning, perhaps with Elizabeth’s powerful slap being the hook. Or right hook. World building can flow organically as their interactions in the elevator progress, and beyond.

    Louisa, heโ€™s missing a couple of signature genes, but not the X chromosome triggers, thatโ€™s to be expected considering his heritage.โ€ I find this sentence confusing. Does it mean he’s missing a couple of signature genes, but he’s not missing the X chromosome triggers? Or does it mean he’s missing a couple of signature genes as well as the X chromosome triggers? And what does “that’s” [that is] refer to? Does it mean “that his missing signature genes is are to be expected (without or along with the X chromosome triggers)? What is expected? Please clarify.

    In the darkest corner of her mind, a door opened. A path to the forest of faded dreams. She kicked her temper in, slammed the door shut, locked it, and broke the key. She didnโ€™t need interference.” We have no idea why she feels a need to do this because we haven’t yet encountered the situation that caused her to feel this way. Most of the time, chronological order is the easiest way to carry a reader to where you want them to be. Jumping back and forth builds more frustration than mystery.

    If Max had been a normal person, or a witch, a regular warlock,” Because you’ve already established that a male witch is a warlock, you don’t need “or a witch” in this sentence. It gives the impression there are three things he might be.

    I really like that the magic in this world has to follow the laws of physics. So wouldn’t “an objectโ€™s weight stayed the same no matter how she changed it” more correctly be “an object’s mass (being the amount of its matter, not the force gravity exerts on it) stayed the same”?

    Elizabeth considered herself an applied scientist of quantum string manipulation.” This is not a stumbling block. It is a stroke of genius.

    The next-to-last paragraph of the second section, beginning, “Of course, youโ€™d have to define happiness…” tells me everything I need to know about their future. My gut reaction was, “So why should I read the rest of the book?”

    I’m not sure interrupting this story to address the reader directly is anything more than a cutesy gimmick. The little flash backs need smoother transitions so they don’t seem so jarring. I can feel the glee indulging in little tangents brings you, but for me, all of that adds to the getting-on-a-horse-and-riding-off-in-all-directions feeling your “delirious prose” gives me.

    I look forward to watching this evolve.

    Liked by 5 people

  37. Sue Ranscht Avatar

    Mimi – A Fine Kettle of Fish

    Although the first seven paragraphs move quickly through an easily visualized, gratifyingly textured setting, I don’t see a reason to keep the old man’s identity a secret until the boxed information. I have a difficult time feeling any connection to him. If I had known from the start that he was a king — and considered incompetent — I would be more invested in his plight and flight. The same goes for Sly. I don’t see any benefit to keeping the fact that he’s a cat from the reader for so long.

    In the context of a conversation with John Dee that takes place after Sly eventually admits he is not the demon he had Dee believing he was, the boxed information provides an in-depth explanation for Sly and his abilities. It also threatens to dilute the impact of the ruse he later perpetrates on Dee when he poses as O-ek, and it eliminates any tension that the reader feels fearing Sly might be found out before it suits him to be.

    Then it’s back to the story, which is already in progress. Who is he talking to? Oh yeah, the old king, Jakome.

    Their interchanges illuminate the fact that they are well-drawn, complex characters. Sly’s anti-religious nature plays out in contrast to Jakome’s religious faith and fear. Well done.

    You’ve put the history and description of Haute-Navarre together very well. Clear and colorful, we know where the two characters we’ve met fit and function. The final paragraph suggests that the king might not be as incompetent as we’ve been told.

    I really like the natural rhythm of your writing, Mimi. It has the flavor of a long-gone period of history, but easily communicates the story and its details in ways modern readers can absorb.

    Liked by 5 people

  38. Sue Ranscht Avatar

    Barb – God and Human Suffering

    I see a need for this book. While my sense is that the general public has soured on those in positions of power to act when they send “thoughts and prayers” to survivors of tragedy, we haven’t yet found a way to transform our disappointment and anger into effective action. This seems to be the result of so many lawmakers at all levels of government being beholden to special monied interests that have a stake in the status quo.

    This chapter builds a case for our responsibility to take action. My impression is that the first third or more leans heavily toward believers. You state several “facts” that strike me as questionable to any non-religious people. This might prevent non-religious readers from completing the chapter. I suggest weaving some of the non-religious portions that follow in the second half into the first half instead.

    The hard fact is that God . . . can work only through humans“. This is an example of your text appearing to be aimed squarely at the religious, but I can’t help wondering if even the faithful accept this as a “hard fact”. Wouldn’t an omnipotent god be able to act on its own? Do events perceived as miracles always involve human action?

    I agree graphs should be few and, with the exception of picture graphs like pie charts, be relegated to an appendix. However, I find the differences between the US, Chile, and Canada in the first graph to be so impressive that I would like to see that information included in the text, maybe followed by something like, “All other countries rank lower than Canada.” Also, I would like to see each slice of pie labeled on the pie graph as “Talking”, “Listening” or “Acting”, with more detailed explanations in the text.

    When we fail to find those answers in the natural realm, we look instinctively to the supernatural.” I wonder if this is as true today as it was before science began making huge advances in our understanding of the universe. I know that when I am faced with something I don’t understand, I think, “Science hasn’t advanced far enough yet.” It never occurs to me — consciously or instinctively — that there might be supernatural or magical explanations. Or are you talking specifically to believers?

    I’m glad you included Spong’s declaration that “All religious systems are human creations by which people in different times and different places seek to journey into that which is ultimately holy and wholly other” It appeals to me in that it seems to accept all religions as valid expressions of a belief in a single God. Even better, “God is the Spirit of Love who gives equal status to every humanโ€”religious or notโ€”and hears every prayer with equal compassion” includes all humanity. Here is another opportunity to emphasize that prayer is not necessarily the province of only the religious. I wonder if this might be more effective at the beginning of the chapter.

    I especially like your speculation about how God of the New Testament evolved from the multi-theistic panoply of ancient Greek and Roman times to the wrathful, vengeful God of the Old Testament. Makes sense to me.

    The last seven paragraphs make a very strong case for humanity taking responsibility for our own failings and cleaning up our own messes. I’m eager to read Chapter 2.

    Liked by 3 people

  39. Barb Woolard Avatar

    Thank you, Sue, for your thoughtful review. I always appreciate your insights.

    I come at this writing from the viewpoint that God is a concept which cannot be ignored. Whether one chooses to accept, reject, or remain neutral, the idea of something beyond human life and intelligence is too pervasive to be discounted, I think. So I don’t think of God as necessarily a “religious” topic; I believe there is a vast chasm between God–whoever or whatever that is–and religion. I think of God as the ultimate good, and I think of religion as a very mixed bag: at its best, a guide to the ultimate good and at its worst the most destructive force ever to exist. And I don’t believe anyone has to ascribe to a particular set of tenets or a certain creed to communicate with whatever is their perception of the supernatural. Perhaps this is what I need to emphasize at the beginning to try to avoid the stigma of “religious” talk.

    To answer, “Wouldnโ€™t an omnipotent god be able to act on its own? Do events perceived as miracles always involve human action?”

    Yes, I believe there are always explanations for “miracles” which stay within the laws of nature. As for an omnipotent God, here’s a sneak preview from chapter 2, in which I’ve even coined a new word to avoid using gender pronouns for God:
    “Louis Evely, in his excellent book Our Prayer, says God ceased to be omnipotent when God created humans and entrusted the world to them: โ€œGod created creators.โ€ He says God limited Godself by creating โ€œa being capable of resisting him, capable of introducing into the world elements that God did not wish.โ€ It is we who create evil and suffering, not God. I have to conclude that only one of the following two statements can be true: God is all powerful. Humans have free will. Both cannot be true simultaneously, because one cancels the other. An all-powerful God would direct everything which occurs on Earth, including what each human being does, which would mean humans were not free to choose for themselves. Humans with freedom to choose will do things which God, the Spirit of Love, would not have chosen for them and which we have to assume displease God; and that would mean God does not have the power to enforce Godโ€™s will in all things.”

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      I understand your intention about the concept of God, and I agree that should be clarified early on.

      Louis Evely, former Catholic priest. Hmm. If I accept that God is a conscious force with omni-abilities and characteristics, I propose that God, being omni-disciplined, exercises God’s own free will to use that omnipotence or not. I don’t see how having power means anyone must use it at every moment. “Humans with freedom to choose will do things which God, the Spirit of Love, would not have chosen for them and which we have to assume displease God; and that would mean God does not have the power to enforce Godโ€™s will in all thingsโ€ is specious reasoning. All-powerful doesn’t mean all-controlling. Omniscient God knows free will means being able to choose differently at any point in life, and never intended to choose for humanity by any account. Some will ultimately do God’s will; some will not. That does not diminish God’s power.

      Evely’s slant alienates me completely.

      The most convincing explanation I have come across is that God the Parent created humanity, imbued it with free will, expressed the parental desire for humanity to do God’s will, then stood back to watch how that would play out. As a parent would do, God the Enforcer made early decisions to control a contrary populace by punishment, from banishment from the garden to large-scale violence. After a time, God the Parent decided — as good parents must — “I knew this time would come. By now, they know right from wrong and can choose right anytime before they die. It’s time to have my offspring set the example — serve as a mentor — while I turn my attention to a new venture. If humanity screws this up, they’re on their own.”

      As long as there are people who will live by the Golden Rule, there is hope for a better, perhaps more godly, world.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        To add my slant on this …

        โ€œHumans with freedom to choose will do things which God, the Spirit of Love, would not have chosen for them and which we have to assume displease God; and that would mean God does not have the power to enforce Godโ€™s will in all thingsโ€

        At age eleven, this type of thinking confused me.

        Likely it was my own contentious relationship with my Dad that even made me think this deeply. My dad hung out on Sundays to watch whatever sporting event was on. My brother slept in. My mom was in California, living with a man (that would become my stepdad,) and his wife at the time. (Yeah I got an interesting education in relationships … another story for another time..) So I hung out at the baptist church with my best friend who’s family was intact, normal and deeply religious. (lot’s of opportunity for eleven year old confusion.)

        I wasn’t shy … I asked questions. The answers were, at best, confusing or the pat “you’re not old enough to discuss that now.” OK well they should be able to tell me why an all knowing, all powerful god gets angry. I understood why my dad got angry. He was angry because something he wasn’t aware of didn’t go his way, or his children with free will didn’t do what he wanted the way he wanted. Dad wasn’t a god. His anger made sense to me, most of the time. Sometimes it seemed ridiculous, (Until I became a parent and went ‘OOOOHHH’) but still it made some sense.

        So how does god get angry if he knows what’s going to happen anyway, because he knows everything, right?
        The cracks in my religious buy-in started early. It was full blown obliterated by the time I exited my twenties. The side effect? Religion fascinated me. It’s history and it’s effect on people. Perhaps it’s my writer DNA that gets piqued when I encounter such complex human fuckery. It’s fascinating and fun to write.

        Ok my two cents, that likely made no sense at all!

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          It makes perfect sense, and thank you for adding your slant. “Complex human fuckery.” There has to be a place for me to work that in! hahaha

          The God portrayed in the Hebrew Old Testament and in the Quran gets angry, but I believe that portrayal is a carry-over from polytheism, where gods were always involved in various shenanigans and intervening/interfering in human affairs. I don’t see God as angry. Disappointed and sad–probably. I think the common practice of making God male and comparing God with fathers has done great harm to any possibility for many people to see God any other way. The old man standing at the pearly gates with a giant book, verifying our credentials for entering the kingdom of golden streets, is such a faulty concept but one which many people I know have a hard time breaking.

          You and I need to have another lunch to compare our interesting family relationships. ๐Ÿ™‚

          Liked by 3 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            LOL happy to be a muse … CHF is my view of all religion and any other fanatical endeavor, including sports …
            A book that I found very relatable is “The Five Levels of Attachment” by don Miguel Ruiz jr. (Son of don Miguel Ruiz of “the Four Agreements” fame.) It’s a good guide to understanding how a normal person can fall into extremist behavior or beliefs.

            Liked by 3 people

            1. Sandy Randall Avatar

              PS …and as to lunch! Absolutely!
              BTW I keep meaning to ask you … Have you ever been to Hugo House or any of it’s events? I went to a writing event there a few years ago. What a neat place!

              Liked by 2 people

              1. Barb Woolard Avatar

                No, I haven’t heard of it. Tell me more.

                Liked by 2 people

                1. Sandy Randall Avatar

                  I discovered them when I was at Swedish hospital. My husband was there because he had a stroke. I went out for a walk when I was visiting him and found their building. I knew about Hugo Awards for Science fiction and about the writer Victor Hugo. (Hunchback of Notre Dame and Les Miserable) but never thought about a writing community with his name.
                  Anyway once my husband was out of the hospital and doing better I looked in to Hugo House and actually participated in a ‘Write-a-thon’ event they were holding.
                  It’s one of the many steps in my journey as a writer. I’ve always wanted to go back and see what else they offer, but since I live on the Penninsula … I forget about it! lol

                  Here’s their website …
                  https://hugohouse.org/?gclid=CjwKCAjwkY2qBhBDEiwAoQXK5W2eCFkMaK4ZsVljbBXvU7X-OWj45YowKd-VaE-eutjO7P570BTYdBoCL4sQAvD_BwE

                  Liked by 2 people

                2. Barb Woolard Avatar

                  Wow! Thanks. I’ll check it out; and next time you come in from the peninsula, let me know. ๐Ÿ™‚

                  Liked by 2 people

          2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            Wait. Isn’t the guy at the gates the Archangel Michael?

            Liked by 2 people

            1. Sandy Randall Avatar

              I thought it was St. Peter ….
              What do I know … I’m a heathen … or wait am I a pagan? hmmm

              Liked by 2 people

              1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

                Could be. I only know for sure it isn’t God “himself”, lol.

                Liked by 2 people

                1. Sandy Randall Avatar

                  Perhaps it is the reflection of god … dog?

                  Liked by 2 people

                  1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

                    Well, they say all dogs go to Heaven, so why not?

                    Liked by 2 people

              2. Barb Woolard Avatar

                I think it depends on which cartoonist you believe. But yeah, God’s busy inside sitting on the big throne.

                Liked by 2 people

  40. Barb Woolard Avatar

    I like your third paragraph, except for the punishment part. I believe humans suffer the consequences of our own actions and God does not step in to protect us from those consequences–like a good parent.

    I understand your distinction between “all-powerful” and “all-controlling,” but the flip side of that, in my mind, is a God who has the power to stop cancer from happening but chooses not to exercise that power. I’m more comfortable with a God who has ceded certain powers than one who has them but uses them whimsically. I think the Deists probably had it right.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      You’re right, and I wasn’t clear enough. I don’t believe human suffering, like disease, poverty, and war, are punishments. I was thinking of the punishments the Bible attributes directly to God like banishing Adam and Eve, Sodom and Gomorrah, the flood, and the 7 plagues — none of which I would attribute to supernatural forces anyway. My point was that the Biblical portrayal of God changed, as you pointed out, with the New Testament. God stepped back from overt devastation as punishment and became a Spirit of Love, God the Father. Not that “he” gave up power, but chose to use it or not — not whimsically, but as “he” determined was called for. It’s only Evely’s faulty reasoning I object to. Think of it as the seasoning that ruined the entire pot of stew.

      Liked by 3 people

  41. Barb Woolard Avatar

    Good analogy. ๐Ÿ™‚

    Liked by 2 people

  42. Sue Ranscht Avatar

    Sandy – Cosmic Chalk

    I think this story has promising potential. Mysterious, alien chalk. A family that seems close, but has lost someone important. A mother with a huge secret.

    Rounded on one end from use, and jagged on the other made her look for another piece.” I believe this means the piece was broken at the jagged end, but what you’ve said is less than direct. “…another piece…” might mean a completely different piece. Maybe it’s “jagged and broken” at the other end and/or she looks for “the rest of it”.

    Lol, as others have pointed out, “Charlie, a mouthful of cereal,” is problematic. Hilarious, but wrong. Also, I think “slurped the rest of his cereal in his mouth” should be “slurped the rest of the cereal into his mouth”.

    Until Charlie shouts, “What the hell, dude!” I imagined he was about 5 years old from his behavior with the cereal. I know Vor is old enough to be on her own, but the boys seem much younger. I’d like their approximate ages to be referenced somehow when we meet them. In fact, I think it would be helpful to have a lot more backstory in this chapter so we know where we are. For instance, Vor is in her mother’s front room, surprised she fell asleep. This indicates she sat down to read intending to stay awake. But then it appears to be early morning, although it might just as well be late at night.

    โ€œMom, this house will fall down around you if you donโ€™t maintain it like Daddy did.โ€ I might have accepted Stella’s nonchalant response as to why no one in the kitchen went to close the door when Vor questions her about it, but this leads me to believe Vor is justified in taking charge of the hunt for the key. Apparently, Mom isn’t on top of most things. And yet, she is strong and in charge when it comes to her chalk. This makes me especially curious about the chalk, where it came from, and what Stella does with it.

    I love this: “She closed her eyes and imagined where a key ring would land when a person walked in.” But it bothers me that Vor’s following attempt to find the key is so half-assed. Shouldn’t she be ripping drawers open and scattering their contents? How lucky for everyone she gives up so easily. It made me think of a storytelling rule I came across a few years ago: Characters can get into trouble by coincidence, but getting out of trouble by coincidence is a writer’s cop out.

    I’m curious why the key had to come off the ring to use it.

    I’m really curious what Stella has been doing with that chalk over the past many years. And how did her kids not know about it?

    You’ve buttoned up the end of the chapter like a sitcom before closing credits. I suggest giving us a reason to immediately turn the page instead.

    You’ve used “twitched” twice to describe something changing someone’s smile. Maybe find a synonym for one of them.

    I want to be, but I’m not yet invested in any of the characters. I don’t have a sense of any of their complex interior worlds — everything seems to be acting on them from the outside. I know their husband/father has died, but the grief seems pretty shallow. Don’t tell me they’re sad, let them show me their sadness.

    I’m looking forward to where the next chapter might take us.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sandy Randall Avatar

      Ok this is another iteration of mouthful Charlie …

      Stella leaned against the far counter, sipping from a mug. Mark and Charlie, Livโ€™s teenage sons, occupied the small vintage kitchen table. Charlie looked up, mouth full of food, and attempted an awkward grin. Markโ€™s sullen gaze remained fixated on his plate of congealed eggs.

      Introducing Liv will explain a bit more about Mark and Charlie …

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

        Much better. Is there a reason you’ve changed the specific “cereal” to the generic “food”? The image is stronger if we know what he’s eating. Besides, I liked the cereal and what he could do with it — like slurping! Also, I think the phrase “mouth full of [whatever]” would connect more smoothly if you used “his mouth full of […]”.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Sandy Randall Avatar

          I havenโ€™t completely decided yet. After I smoothed that out I backtracked over the introduction of Stellaโ€ฆ I figured I would work that out before I finished the boys ๐Ÿ˜‚

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

            Despite a former wannabe mathematician’s lingering affection for generality, I much prefer the specific โ€œcerealโ€ to the generic โ€œfoodโ€ here.  Please don’t go over the top by naming the brand of cereal.

            Liked by 2 people

        2. Sandy Randall Avatar

          Hereโ€™s where Iโ€™m at with Stella. I stopped for the evening so I could let this stew for a bit. Itโ€™s not exactly right yet. I also need to read some of the later chapters to reconnect with what I know of her.

          โ€œStella leaned against the far counter, sipping from a mug. Not for the first time did Vor marvel at her motherโ€™s well preserved looks. Her auburn hair, still glossy and full, framed a petite round face. Laugh lines, delicately etched around her eyes and mouth, only noticeable in the right light, hinted at her age. Her eyes, even when focused on a person, had an exotic, infinite quality. Vor imagined her motherโ€™s timeline somehow operating at a slower pace than everyone else.โ€

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            I can see her and get a sense of her impact. Love it!

            Liked by 1 person

            1. Sandy Randall Avatar

              I want Vorโ€™s observations to also foreshadow Vor herself.
              You know how people tend to have friction with the people they are most like in their family?
              This is a dynamic for Vorโ€™s personalityโ€ฆ one sheโ€™ll need to deal with eventuallyโ€ฆ
              Her mother frustrates and irritates her, and she was definitely Daddyโ€™s girl. His death was hard on her and she always assumed Stella was too aloof to feel his loss.
              She grew up in her mothers house but she really doesnโ€™t know her mother at all.

              Liked by 1 person

  43. Sandy Randall Avatar

    Thank you Sue.
    I’ve been working on the revision for the next WIP. I agree with you about the overall, over simplification and definitely the lame end. Since I wrote it it initially for a contest, I knew nothing about these characters, or their world. That lack of knowledge really shines here! lol.
    I hope to have much of this solved. Chapter two will have to wait, although I have been working on it … I’m not sure it will survive. It may be absorbed by chapter 1 and the rest of the story.
    You brought up a great point about her not tearing through drawers in the shop. This offers me an opportunity to give some depth to Vor and her relationship to her father. The shop for Vor is sacred ground. She has a reverence for it and disturbing it would be difficult for her to do.
    The same goes for Stella’s reluctance to fix things in the house. She misses her husband. Another opportunity to dig into the depth of their story as well.
    Of course these are all things I discovered as i continued to write this story. Like John, the subsequent chapters help fill out the first chapter.
    I also like your observation of the key ring. I’ll toy with that a bit two. In my own head I had the thought of why is that key on that ring? Why would Stella not have it with her? It’s her equipment and has nothing to do with the shop …. or does it? There must be a story in why that key is where it is and why it must come off the ring …
    Figuring these things out is pure fun.

    “This indicates she sat down to read intending to stay awake. But then it appears to be early morning, although it might just as well be late at night.”

    This part has bothered me as well. Another oddity of writing off the cuff. Totally at odds with the mouthful of cereal and time of day.

    Ok Back to work … Thank you!!

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      I had an elderly aunt who ate a bowl of Lucky Charms every night before going to bed. I guess cereal is like pancakes — good for any time of day or night, lol.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        When visiting a relative, I learned that a bowl of cereal can be a satisfying dinnertime snack after having had a heavy meal at lunchtime. I came home and bought myself a box of cereal. ๐Ÿ™‚

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

          To get a quick light meal, put about 2 oz of trail mix and about 30 g of cereal in a bowl, then add about a quarter (roughly 83 g) of one of those protein shakes from Ensure and others with 30 g protein in the full bottle.  No milk needed.

          Liked by 1 person

      2. Sandy Randall Avatar

        Breakfast … to break down the word … is simply ending a fast. I think it works for any meal. And if I want last nights meatloaf for breakfast … why not.
        Still the time of day in my story is not clear, regardless of the cereal muncher and coffee drinkers … I will fix that!

        Liked by 3 people

  44. Barb Woolard Avatar

    Completely unrelated to anyone’s WIP submission but interesting nonetheless, I have been rereading Stephen King’s book On Writing (how the hell do you do italics on here?). This is the only Stephen King book I’ve ever read, because horror gives me nightmares, but he has some good writing tips.

    These are a few gems mined from yesterday’s reading:

    Adverbs are not your friends.
    “Description is what makes the reader a sensory participant in the story.”
    “If you do your job, your characters will come to life and start doing stuff on their own.”
    You must tell the truth if your dialogue is to have resonance and realism.
    “Some people don’t want to hear the truth, of course, but that’s not your problem. What would be [your problem] is wanting to be a writer without wanting to shoot straight.” This one, I think, applies equally to nonfiction but without the dialogue.
    On rewriting, a quote from Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch: “Murder your darlings.” This one is SO HARD!!!

    Nothing anyone here doesn’t already know, but I just love seeing various slants on important aspects of our craft.

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Sandy Randall Avatar

      Several years ago I went to Wichita and stood in line in freezing cold with my Dad and sister-in-law to listen to Stephen King talk.
      Well worth the cold endurance.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        Wow! I’d stand in the cold for that, too. I have a friend who worked as his secretary for 16 years, and she speaks very highly of him as a person.

        Liked by 2 people

    2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      I agree that using adverbs to explain every weak verb, adverb or adjective is poor writing. Just use better verbs, adverbs, and adjectives. But have you ever read Douglas Adams? His creative, genius use of adverbs puts King in a corner, and made me unafraid to use adverbs.

      I’ve tried reading Stephen King a few times. I remember only one scene that grabbed me, but not in the book. It was played out in a movie, but I am not a fan. The books I’ve finished all ended with copouts. Kubrick’s treatment of The Shining was brilliant and terrifying. Turns out King hated it, so remade it as a six hour mini-series several years later. It was the slowest thing I’ve ever made myself watch. What a disappointment.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Barb Woolard Avatar

        King has made a LOT of money writing stuff a lot of people like, but I do NOT see him as the last word on how to write. I really don’t know whether his novels are any good, because I avoid horror in general. I do for the most part agree with him on adverbs; I think, as he says, if you give enough information about the circumstances under which the door was closed, the reader doesn’t need to be told, “He closed the door firmly.” It will be obvious. But I think all rules are guidelines; good writers know when something works and when it doesn’t.

        Liked by 3 people

      2. Barb Woolard Avatar

        The one that stands out most to me on this list is “Murder your darlings.” I’ve done a lot of murdering in the last few days, and it’s hard. But then when I reread the chapter without them, I know they should have been put out of their misery long ago.

        Liked by 3 people

        1. Sandy Randall Avatar

          That can get addictive. Purging your darlings feels good when you uncover the clean prose. The difficult part is knowing when a darling is your star!

          Liked by 3 people

          1. Barb Woolard Avatar

            Agreed, and that’s one of the things that makes it so hard. Some of the things I’ve written and thought “This is dumb” are the things others pick right out as “brilliant”; and some that I’ve thought “This is brilliant” are the first things to get panned.

            Liked by 3 people

    3. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

      To get italics in comments, use the Markdown convention for indicating italics.  Wrap whatever should be in italics with asterisks.  This is a widely used convention that is clearer than the older overloading of quote marks for titles.  For the moment, U won’t have genuine italics but will have a well-known workaround applicable to comments on any blog.

      Next step is to ask a one-time favor from somebody with access to the WP-admin page for the Writer’s Co-op site.

      (1) Near the bottom of the menu ribbon on the left in the WP-admin page, there is an icon showing 2 sliders.

      (2) Hover on that icon and a Settings menu pops up.  Click on Discussion, then scroll to the Comments section.

      (3) Turn ON the switch marked [Use Markdown for comments.] at the bottom of the section.  Dunno why the WP default is to leave the switch OFF.

      Once that switch is ON, it will stay on.  Comment text wrapped in asterisks when submitted will appear in italics.  Markdown also has ways to get bold face and a lot more of the HTML stuff somebody might want in a comment but can’t get in the obvious way.  Details are in the WP support pages but can trigger a migraine.  Click on the info icon and then on [Learn more] if U are that curious

      Liked by 2 people

      1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

        Thanks, Mel. I’ve activated Markdown. An asterisk at each end of what you want italicized will make it so.

        Liked by 2 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          Thank you, Mel, for the explanation; and thank you, Sue, for making it happen.

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            I’m happy to have learned something new and be able to put it to public use.

            Liked by 1 person

  45. Sandy Randall Avatar

    I agree with the copout endings. I’ve always thought that and I was let down that his scary monster in “It” turned out to be a giant spider. The clown was way scarier.
    I did like “The Stand.” I felt like his writing and his characters were much better there. Trash Can man was a terrific character. I few months ago I listened to one of his more recent stories, “Fairy Tale.” I enjoyed that one as well. Some of his stuff he does better than others.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Barb Woolard Avatar

      He cranks them out pretty fast, so I’m not surprised that they’re mixed quality.

      Liked by 3 people

      1. Sandy Randall Avatar

        I think that’s a fair assessment. Plus at the end of the day, writing is subjective. Beta readers are important because they offer a consensus of what works and what does not. You don’t enjoy horror, I despise romance. Yet even if the romance was well written, I wouldn’t read it. I’m not interested in novels or stories that focus on romance. Having said that, I do enjoy stories where characters get together in the natural course of the story, but it is not the entire plot of the story. Too me a story that over indulges in romance, or magic or horror is like eating and entire three tiered, sugar laden cake. My teeth start rotting out of my head just by looking at it.
        I like an all around story, with some romance, some adventure, maybe so magic or mystery or other things sprinkled in. The basis of the stories have to have characters whose lives I want to indulge my time with. I also want to write those stories. Thanks to you guys giving me excellent feedback … I have a shot!

        Liked by 4 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          I agree completely, Sandy! I can recall reading one romance, shared with me by an older woman whom I and everyone I know held in high esteem and even reverence. When she handed me a book and said, “Barb, I think you’d like this,” I was expecting to open something deep and inspiring. The first page was a sex scene. I read the whole thing, because I kept thinking she would not have given me something so shallow. But it was indeed a romance. It was pretty well written, I did become invested in the main characters, and the story was engaging–but still not my favorite genre. You never know about those little old ladies! ๐Ÿ™‚

          Liked by 2 people

          1. Sandy Randall Avatar

            Yeah I have a friend who loves 50 Shades of Gray. She knows better than to talk to me about it. I find the instructions on the raid can more engaging!

            Liked by 2 people

          2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            I despise romance novels as well. And that’s why I want to say right now that Chapter 2 of THE APP is a one-off, lol!

            Liked by 2 people

            1. Barb Woolard Avatar

              Now I’m really going to be looking forward to it! Natalie and Erick? Natalie and Michael? Erick and Michael? Mr. Morton and someone? This is too much suspense! LOL!

              Liked by 2 people

              1. Sandy Randall Avatar

                My vote is Natalie and Michaelโ€ฆ

                Editโ€ฆ
                In the Elevator with Elizabeth.. oh waitโ€ฆ

                Liked by 2 people

              2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

                Hahaha! Less than two weeks to the big reveal . . .

                Liked by 2 people

            2. Barb Woolard Avatar

              AHA! It’s Mr. Morton and Majel! A flashback.

              Liked by 2 people

              1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

                You guys are too funny!

                Liked by 2 people

  46. mimispeike Avatar
    mimispeike

    Sue: โ€œThe first time I met my Great-Aunt Majel, I threw up all over her antique Persian rug.โ€ A marvelous first line. The disk is an intriguing object. You donโ€™t get into it here, nor should you. This is a set-up.

    You get a little cute with your adjectives, as do I. (Iโ€™m trying to rein myself in): whimpered squeal – glinting waves of white hair. Also with your verbs: … her mane of brandy hair jittered against her shoulders. Jittered? “… a brittle crumple of waxy brown paper,” This I like, very much. “…leaned forward to scooch it toward Natalie.” Scooch? Iโ€™m always looking for interesting verbs myself. Scooch is a bridge too far.

    Some of your description is very nice, and some is overdone. This is my tendency also. I go through my writing, looking for anything that doesnโ€™t need to be there.

    I canโ€™t fathom what this means: Temples that curved in half circles behind his ears held them close to his face.

    I like the incidental comments, Columbo-like: โ€œI swear,โ€ the attorney mumbled, picking up the cookie, โ€œthe kneading hurts worse than the needles.โ€ Reaching for the only folder on his desk, he bit the cookie in half. โ€œMmmm. Savory. Reminds me of Mumbai.โ€

    Youโ€™re hinting at the relationship. I wish you would give us a bit more on it, so Iโ€™m not wondering whatโ€™s going on with them. What did he do or not do? Why is he “trying”? “Heโ€™s trying, she told herself. Give him a break.โ€

    โ€œOh, and the old-people smell.โ€ She cringed. โ€œIf it werenโ€™t for that, I wouldnโ€™t mind inheriting her apartment.โ€ I donโ€™t buy it. Who wouldnโ€™t want to inherit a New York apartment? Hire a maid service to clean it out.

    We donโ€™t have any real story here. What jumps out at me (and not in a good way) are those zany verbs and adjectives. I canโ€™t think about anything else. I could probably get away with some of that, my character being a talking cat. Here, for me, it doesn’t work.

    Liked by 4 people

    1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

      I appreciate your specificity, Mimi. It helps a lot when someone points out my excesses so I can clarify my poor expression. I work to use verbs and adjectives that mean precisely what I want to describe so readers can visualize the movie that’s playing in my head while I write. It’s a bonus for me if the sound of the word also evokes the meaning. As for “jittered” and “scooched”, I wish I could take credit, but I didn’t make those verbs up. The first means “moved nervously” as her hair seemed to do, and the second means “moved a short distance” as in, “She scooched her chair forward an inch at a time.” Which is how the ancient Mr. Morton is moving that box across the desk. It’s so clear in my head, lol.

      “Temples that curved in half circles behind his ears held them close to his face.” Would this be better: Temples that curved in half circles behind his ears kept his glasses from sliding down his nose.” On second thought, you’re right — I’ll delete the sentence.

      You’re also right that Chapter 1 isn’t a story. It’s introductions, a bit of background, and an inciting incident. We will learn more about Natalie and Erick’s past relationship, but for now it has to be enough to know it was troubled and he’s trying to improve his standing. Did that much come across for you? I also wanted to leave the reader with more questions than answers or why turn the page?

      I had hoped to establish that Natalie harbors strong emotional memories. Have I fallen short there? We learn that she can create a phantom old-people smell with its unpleasant associations. Maybe people with lighter emotional baggage would find a good apartment cleaning enough and never think about it again.

      I’m glad you let me know that the language itself took your attention away from the story. That tells me the gingerbread trim around the window gets in the way of the view. I’ll see what I can do about that. I just know that I would rather read strong, precise verbs and adjectives than generic ones like “moved” and “pushed”. That’s part of why I’m interested in reading your footnotes — particularly when you use unfamiliar vocabulary.

      Your honesty is priceless, Mimi. I hope you won’t hold back. Thanks!

      Liked by 4 people

      1. mimispeike Avatar
        mimispeike

        “Maybe people with lighter emotional baggage would find a good apartment cleaning enough and never think about it again.” – I suspected something like that.

        Jittered may be a legit word, but here it feels forced to me. Same for scooched. Yes, we want strong, precise verbs and adjectives but too much of it gets in the way of the story. I’d better give my own next piece a severe read-through. As I said, I have the same tendencies.

        I’ve spent the last day trying to tone down some of my excessively flavorful language. A bit too much of a good thing? Just be aware of the possibility.

        Liked by 4 people

        1. Barb Woolard Avatar

          I tend to agree with Mark Twain: “Never use a five-dollar word when a fifty-cent word will do.” Obviously, Twain was no slouch in the vocabulary department, but I have often remembered that advice when writing–though I admit I have not always heeded it.

          I have to agree that, even though I know “jittered” is a legit word, it makes me a bit jittery in this context. I might go with “danced” if I wanted to convey the image. Or something a bit more familiar so as not to get readers so hung up on word choice that their attention is drawn away from the story.

          Liked by 4 people

          1. mimispeike Avatar
            mimispeike

            Barb, you’re the professional. I’m only a life-long reader, going on my instincts and impulses. So I’m always afraid of making a fool of myself when I criticize, I have no college background to back it up. I just give my gut feeling. So everyone should take what I say with a grain of salt.

            Liked by 3 people

            1. Sandy Randall Avatar

              Mimi
              In my eyes the life long reader is just as valid as the professional.
              A reader who is willing to explain why something doesnโ€™t work when the read is very helpful. Far better to say โ€œ ok maybe your story idea is good, but I canโ€™t read this because all your characters are indistinguishable.โ€
              Rather than, โ€œyour story is ok. Thanks for letting me read it.โ€
              The latter is frustrating, patronizing and offers no helpful direction.
              Good critiquing gives you ideas and energizes your desire to make the story better.
              Offering up a patronizing platitude to save the writerโ€™s feelings is a disservice to any writer wanting to improve.
              I love your Frank direct approach. You say what you likeminded what you dont.
              It always makes me want to do better even if itโ€™s another writers work you are critiquing.
              I have learned so much about my own work from everyone here. Your contribution counts with the same weight as everyone else!

              Liked by 4 people

            2. Sandy Randall Avatar

              Ps
              As for the grain of saltโ€ฆ thatโ€™s just wise advice for any advice profferedโ€ฆ

              Liked by 4 people

            3. Barb Woolard Avatar

              Mimi, I was a professional in my classroom. Here, I’m a writer and a reader. My critiques should be taken no more seriously than anyone else’s. Every reader knows what works for him/her, and that’s what each of us needs to hear from the group. It takes a lot of “guts” to put your work out for others to read and critique, especially when the critiques are open for anyone to read, but this is the only way we grow. Thank you for all you do for this group.

              Liked by 4 people

          2. Sue Ranscht Avatar

            Although “danced” removes the nervous aspect, good point.

            Liked by 4 people

            1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

              I find [danced] too cheerful.

              Liked by 3 people

          3. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

            Tho big on simple direct language, I do like the vividness of [scooch] and [jitter].

            Liked by 2 people

            1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

              Exactly. I see the movie as I write and work to choose precise words that make what I see vivid for readers. The response seems to differ depending on whether the reader is more visually oriented or more literarily oriented.

              Liked by 3 people

              1. Mellow Curmudgeon Avatar

                I’m something like 50-50.

                Liked by 3 people

                1. Sue Ranscht Avatar

                  I consider the music of the language as well, which probably indicates an elevated aural orientation that matters only if you read every word in your head or out loud, lol. Well, they do say, “Write what you want to read.”

                  Liked by 2 people

                2. Barb Woolard Avatar

                  I’m probably also a 50-50.

                  I do like “scooched” but remain a member of Team Anti-Jittered. A third aspect, besides visual vs literal, is word association, which is admittedly subjective.

                  “Danced” was just the first word which came to mind as an alternative; I’m sure there are a dozen others. “Jittered,” for me, carries the connotation of nervousness, while “danced” seems more neutral. But then you two associate “danced” with cheerfulness, so really it boils down to what you said, Sue: “Write what you want to read.” There’s probably no single word that carries the same connotation for every reader.

                  Liked by 2 people

                3. Sue Ranscht Avatar

                  So you did see it, Barb! That nervous energy was exactly what I was trying to communicate. Are you telling me you don’t see Natalie as showing nervous energy or do you associate nervousness with anxiety and not with a form of energy?

                  Like

              2. Barb Woolard Avatar

                Natalie, yes. Her hair, no. I see both associations for “jittered,” and I can see how both could apply to Natalie in this situation. But it seems like a human thing, not a hair thing.

                Liked by 1 person

Leave a comment